VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault Trafic Transporter?

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Renault Trafic Transporter

details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,392 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Renault Trafic Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Trafic Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers very slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Trafic Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,848 kg. The difference is around 393 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries considerably more – 1,222 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 726 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Trafic Transporter comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,100
Trafic Transporter

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 240 - 318 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details
serpimg_zzYFEX

Reviews Renault Trafic Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Mazda CX-30
Opel Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Opel …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Fiat Scudo
Renault Trafic Transporter
VS
In the competitive landscape of transporters, the Fiat Scudo and Renault Trafic offer compelling choices for businesses seeking versatility and efficiency. The Fiat Scudo impresses with its compact design and exceptional fuel economy, making it ideal for navigating tight urban environments. On the …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Symbioz
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz present two compelling yet distinct choices for crossover enthusiasts. The CX-30 shines with its refined interior, agile handling, and a traditional gasoline powertrain that appeals to purists. Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz, as an …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 184 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.