VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Octavia Limousine comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Skoda Octavia Limousine?

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Octavia Limousine: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
details

Skoda Octavia Limousine

  • barely cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Octavia Limousine is barely cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Limousine uses 4.3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Octavia Limousine

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Limousine offers marginally more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Limousine is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.6 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Limousine delivers noticeably more torque with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Limousine is only slightly lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Limousine offers clearly more boot space – 600 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Limousine carries very slightly more – 545 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Octavia Limousine is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
Octavia Limousine

Skoda Octavia Limousine

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Octavia Limousine

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Octavia Limousine

The Skoda Octavia Limousine blends space and sensible charm into a calm, grown-up package that feels smarter than its modest badge suggests. Practical, comfortable and quietly clever, it's the sort of car that makes everyday driving feel noticeably less mundane and keeps both your wallet and patience intact.

details
SKODA OCTAVIA Dynamisch_116156
SKODA OCTAVIA Dynamisch_116146
SKODA OCTAVIA Dynamisch_116157
SKODA OCTAVIA Interieur_116221
SKODA OCTAVIA Details_116175

Reviews Skoda Octavia Limousine

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Honda Civic
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Honda Civic and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Octavia Limousine
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Octavia Estate and the Skoda Octavia Sedan largely comes down to whether you prioritise cargo space and practicality or a cleaner, more traditional booted silhouette. Mechanically they’re very similar — same engines, tech and driving character — but the Estate delivers …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Octavia Limousine

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
25,000 - 39,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
111 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,537 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
600 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
503 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.6 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.