@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Tesla, Inc.
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Tesla Model 3 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or Tesla Model 3?

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Tesla Model 3

1 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Tesla Model 3 costs 34300 £. That’s a price difference of around 9043 £.

Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a significantly edge – offering 460 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 274 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 5.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 58 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model 3 pulls decisively stronger with 660 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 420 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1822 kg. The difference is around 367 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers noticeable more room – 594 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 evident takes the win – 496 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 163 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Tesla Model 3 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Mazda CX-30
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.2 - 16.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 550 - 750 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Tesla Model 3

1 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.

details
0x0-Model3_06 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_RHD_03 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_12 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_09 @ Tesla, Inc.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Tesla Model 3

1 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Tesla Model 3 and the Skoda Elroq, the electric sedan showcases Tesla's cutting-edge technology and impressive range, making it a formidable contender in the EV market. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, …
Mazda CX-30
Tesla Model 3
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
34300 - 50100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
594 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
303 - 333 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Tesla

Similar Comparisons

@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
VS
In the battle of retro charm versus modern innovation, the Renault R5 brings a nostalgic touch to urban driving, boasting its compact design and playful aesthetics. On the other hand, the Tesla Model 3 showcases cutting-edge technology and impressive electric range, appealing to those seeking …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click