VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-30 meets Toyota Proace City Compact Van.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21200 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4054 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Proace City Compact Van manages with 5.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a evident edge – offering 186 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.10 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slight better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Proace City Compact Van pulls slightly stronger with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is hardly perceptible lighter – 1358 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 97 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs clearly better – up to 4300 L, which is about 2894 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace City Compact Van convincingly takes the win – 921 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 425 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van shows itself to be secures victory with a clear margin and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £21,200

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • Engine Type : Electric, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6.6 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.50 kWh
  • Electric Range : 337 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

The Toyota Proace City is a versatile compact van designed to cater to the needs of businesses and families alike. With its spacious interior and efficient engine options, it ensures a comfortable and agile driving experience, making it ideal for urban and suburban environments. The Proace City also offers a range of advanced safety features and connectivity options, ensuring both security and convenience on the road.

details

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
21200 - 37700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.50 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
337 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 150 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1358 - 1837 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4395 mm
Length
4401 - 4751 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1848 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1860 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4300 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
560 - 921 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage stands out with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its sporty handling and upscale interior, appealing to those who prioritize an engaging driving experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on whether buyers value practicality and space or a more dynamic, luxurious feel on the road.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.