VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Toyota Urban Cruiser?

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • noticeably lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Toyota Urban Cruiser

3.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is visibly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Toyota Urban Cruiser costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,715 £.

Urban Cruiser

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers marginally more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Urban Cruiser is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Urban Cruiser delivers clearly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 67 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,839 kg. The difference is around 384 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more boot space – 430 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries moderately more – 496 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Urban Cruiser shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
Urban Cruiser

Toyota Urban Cruiser

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 174 - 184 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 395 - 426 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Urban Cruiser
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Toyota C-HR, you’re choosing between a practical, city-focused compact SUV that emphasizes efficiency and easy maneuverability and a more stylized, tech-forward crossover that leans toward a sportier driving feel and premium touches. If your priority is …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Urban Cruiser

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota Urban Cruiser

The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a compact SUV that offers a blend of style and practicality, making it well-suited for urban living. It captures attention with its bold design, while providing a high driving position that enhances visibility and control on city roads. Inside, the Urban Cruiser offers comfortable seating and a range of features that cater to both driver and passengers, emphasizing convenience and everyday usability.

details
serpimg_OTMQ0U

Reviews Toyota Urban Cruiser

3.5 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross feels like the posh city slicker — sharper to drive, better finished and available with efficient hybrid tech — while the Toyota Urban Cruiser plays the sensible sidekick: cheaper, simpler and easier to live with. Pick the Yaris Cross if you want refinement and economy, …
Toyota Corolla Cross
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Corolla Cross and the Toyota Urban Cruiser comes down to whether you value roomy comfort and composed road manners or compact agility and city-friendly practicality. The Corolla Cross leans toward better interior space and highway refinement, while the Urban Cruiser is …
Toyota RAV4
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Toyota Urban Cruiser aim at different buyers: the RAV4 is a larger, more capable and comfortable compact SUV, while the Urban Cruiser is a smaller, city-focused crossover that prioritizes maneuverability and efficiency. This comparison looks at practicality, driving character, …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
In a competitive showdown between the Mazda CX-30 and the VW Golf, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and characteristics. The CX-30 impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and practicality, while the Golf offers a well-rounded …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Audi Q2 and Mazda CX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Urban Cruiser

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
33,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
395 - 426 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,839 - 1,939 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
306 - 310 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
411 - 421 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
174 - 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 8.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
128 - 135 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.