VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Volvo XC60?

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly lighter

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-30

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo XC60: The Compact SUV Showdown

When it comes to choosing a compact SUV, potential buyers often gravitate towards the balance of style, functionality, and cutting-edge technology. The 2024 Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC60 are two contenders that bring unique strengths to the table. Today, we dive into the specifics of these models, examining what sets them apart in performance, innovation, and overall appeal.

XC60

Performance and Efficiency

The Mazda CX-30 offers a range of petrol MHEV engine options, displaying a power spectrum of 140 to 186 HP, paired with either a manual or automatic transmission. It offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, catering to various driving preferences. Its fuel consumption ranges from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, aligning well with its role as an efficient and dependable option. With an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, the CX-30 combines responsiveness with commendable fuel efficiency.

Conversely, Volvo XC60 offers more powerful engine configurations, including petrol MHEV and a Plugin Hybrid, with horsepower ranging from 250 to a staggering 455 HP. The allure of the XC60 lies in its robust acceleration, capable of achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds with the Plugin Hybrid. The model excels in efficiency, particularly the Plugin Hybrid, which uses only 0.9 L/100km of petrol due to its extensive electric range of up to 80 km.

CX-30

Design and Comfort

Both the Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC60 boast premium design features, with the CX-30's compact dimensions at 4395 mm in length offering a sleek silhouette, while accommodating 5 passengers comfortably. It provides a cargo space of up to 430 liters, making it versatile for everyday needs.

The XC60 provides a more spacious alternative with a length of 4688 mm, affording it a larger trunk capacity of up to 483 liters. This roominess complements its luxurious interior, noted for high-quality materials and sophisticated design, a hallmark of Volvo's renowned commitment to comfort.

XC60

Safety and Technology

Safety remains a priority for both brands, though each takes a unique approach. Mazda's i-Activsense safety suite includes features like driver attention alerts and radar cruise control, ensuring every journey is secure and pleasant. The CX-30 also integrates technology smoothly with options like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Volvo's reputation for safety is unrivaled in the industry, and the XC60 furthers this legacy with cutting-edge features such as Pilot Assist and adaptive cruise control. Its infotainment system is powered by Google, boasting intuitive voice commands and seamless integration with other smart devices, providing an enriched driving experience.

CX-30

Conclusion

Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. The CX-30 serves as a stylish, compact option with efficient performance for the everyday driver, while the XC60 stands as a powerful, luxurious vehicle ideal for those seeking advanced technology and comfort. Both vehicles hold their ground in the SUV market, each delivering impressive performance wrapped in distinctive marques renowned for quality and innovation.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,957 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 269 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 469 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is visibly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 445 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers somewhat more boot space – 483 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries very slightly more – 550 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
Mazda CX-30
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
Mazda CX-30
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption

Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.