Compare performance (186 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Volvo XC60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing a compact SUV, potential buyers often gravitate towards the balance of style, functionality, and cutting-edge technology. The 2024 Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC60 are two contenders that bring unique strengths to the table. Today, we dive into the specifics of these models, examining what sets them apart in performance, innovation, and overall appeal.
The Mazda CX-30 offers a range of petrol MHEV engine options, displaying a power spectrum of 140 to 186 HP, paired with either a manual or automatic transmission. It offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, catering to various driving preferences. Its fuel consumption ranges from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, aligning well with its role as an efficient and dependable option. With an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, the CX-30 combines responsiveness with commendable fuel efficiency.
Conversely, Volvo XC60 offers more powerful engine configurations, including petrol MHEV and a Plugin Hybrid, with horsepower ranging from 250 to a staggering 455 HP. The allure of the XC60 lies in its robust acceleration, capable of achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds with the Plugin Hybrid. The model excels in efficiency, particularly the Plugin Hybrid, which uses only 0.9 L/100km of petrol due to its extensive electric range of up to 80 km.
Both the Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC60 boast premium design features, with the CX-30's compact dimensions at 4395 mm in length offering a sleek silhouette, while accommodating 5 passengers comfortably. It provides a cargo space of up to 430 liters, making it versatile for everyday needs.
The XC60 provides a more spacious alternative with a length of 4688 mm, affording it a larger trunk capacity of up to 483 liters. This roominess complements its luxurious interior, noted for high-quality materials and sophisticated design, a hallmark of Volvo's renowned commitment to comfort.
Safety remains a priority for both brands, though each takes a unique approach. Mazda's i-Activsense safety suite includes features like driver attention alerts and radar cruise control, ensuring every journey is secure and pleasant. The CX-30 also integrates technology smoothly with options like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
Volvo's reputation for safety is unrivaled in the industry, and the XC60 furthers this legacy with cutting-edge features such as Pilot Assist and adaptive cruise control. Its infotainment system is powered by Google, boasting intuitive voice commands and seamless integration with other smart devices, providing an enriched driving experience.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preference and lifestyle needs. The CX-30 serves as a stylish, compact option with efficient performance for the everyday driver, while the XC60 stands as a powerful, luxurious vehicle ideal for those seeking advanced technology and comfort. Both vehicles hold their ground in the SUV market, each delivering impressive performance wrapped in distinctive marques renowned for quality and innovation.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,572 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 220 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 429 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is substantially lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 695 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries very slightly more – 510 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
59 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España