@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs VW T-Cross – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or VW T-Cross?

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Introduction to the Compact SUV Showdown

The compact SUV segment has gained immense popularity in recent years, combining practicality with style and performance. Two of the standout contenders in this category are the Mazda CX-30 and the Volkswagen T-Cross. Each vehicle offers unique strengths, innovative technology, and a driving experience that appeals to various types of drivers. In this article, we delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two models apart, giving you a clearer picture of which SUV redefines the compact category for 2024.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30 boasts a sleek, dynamic design, measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height. This design emphasizes an athletic stance while ensuring comfort for passengers with its spacious 5-seat interior. The CX-30 also features an impressive trunk capacity of 430 liters, which expands versatility when packing for road trips or daily errands.

On the other hand, the Volkswagen T-Cross is slightly smaller, with dimensions of 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1573 mm in height. Despite its smaller size, the T-Cross does provide a respectable trunk capacity of 455 liters. Both vehicles have a 5-door layout, making them practical for families and urban drivers alike.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance

Under the hood, the Mazda CX-30 offers a choice of petrol engines with hybrid technology, providing an option that delivers up to 186 HP and torque of 240 Nm. Whether you prefer the manual gearbox or the smooth automatic transmission, the CX-30 achieves acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in an impressive 8.3 seconds. The fuel consumption averages between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, making it an economical choice for driving enthusiasts.

Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents an array of petrol engines, ranging from 95 HP to a robust 150 HP, offering torque figures that peak at 250 Nm. The best performance of the T-Cross can achieve a 0 to 100 km/h time of 8.4 seconds, thanks to its effective dual-clutch automatic transmission. Its fuel consumption averages around 5.6 to 6 L/100 km, which is commendable for its class.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Driving Dynamics and Comfort

The CX-30 is equipped with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, enhancing traction and handling, particularly in adverse weather conditions. The suspension system is tuned for both comfort and agility, providing a driver-focused experience that remains smooth over various terrains. Additionally, the cabin is crafted with high-quality materials and a modern infotainment system, including a large display, smartphone connectivity, and advanced audio features.

In contrast, the T-Cross focuses on delivering a balanced ride with front-wheel drive. Its design includes a user-friendly infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones, ensuring connectivity on the road. While its ride may lean slightly more towards comfort than sportiness compared to the CX-30, the T-Cross provides ample headroom and legroom for all passengers, making it great for longer journeys.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Safety Features and Innovations

Both SUVs come equipped with a suite of advanced safety features designed to protect occupants and assist drivers. The Mazda CX-30 offers the i-Activsense safety package, which includes adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and smart city brake support, all contributing to a secure driving experience.

The T-Cross also does not fall short in the safety department, featuring adaptive cruise control and emergency braking, among other driver assistance systems. The inclusion of these features in both vehicles highlights the car manufacturers' commitment to making the driving experience as safe as possible for everyone on the road.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Conclusion: Which SUV Wins?

Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Volkswagen T-Cross ultimately boils down to individual preferences and priorities. If you seek a vehicle that offers sporty dynamics, robust engine options, and an upscale interior, the Mazda CX-30 is the way to go. However, if you prefer a more compact size with excellent trunk space and family-friendly features, the VW T-Cross would be a commendable choice.

Both vehicles represent their brands well in the compact SUV market, but the decision will rely on what aspects of an SUV matter most to the buyer. As these models continue to evolve with the times, they remain iconic representations of their manufacturers' innovative spirit and commitment to quality.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4157 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Cross manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a slightly edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 204 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Cross pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is slightly lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 188 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers slight more room – 455 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – up to 1406 L, which is about 125 L more than the VW T-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 slight takes the win – 496 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Cross
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.