VS

Mazda CX-30 vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or VW T-Cross?

Mazda CX-30 vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-30

Introduction to the Compact SUV Showdown

The compact SUV segment has gained immense popularity in recent years, combining practicality with style and performance. Two of the standout contenders in this category are the Mazda CX-30 and the Volkswagen T-Cross. Each vehicle offers unique strengths, innovative technology, and a driving experience that appeals to various types of drivers. In this article, we delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two models apart, giving you a clearer picture of which SUV redefines the compact category for 2024.

T-Cross

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30 boasts a sleek, dynamic design, measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height. This design emphasizes an athletic stance while ensuring comfort for passengers with its spacious 5-seat interior. The CX-30 also features an impressive trunk capacity of 430 liters, which expands versatility when packing for road trips or daily errands.

On the other hand, the Volkswagen T-Cross is slightly smaller, with dimensions of 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1573 mm in height. Despite its smaller size, the T-Cross does provide a respectable trunk capacity of 455 liters. Both vehicles have a 5-door layout, making them practical for families and urban drivers alike.

CX-30

Engine and Performance

Under the hood, the Mazda CX-30 offers a choice of petrol engines with hybrid technology, providing an option that delivers up to 186 HP and torque of 240 Nm. Whether you prefer the manual gearbox or the smooth automatic transmission, the CX-30 achieves acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in an impressive 8.3 seconds. The fuel consumption averages between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, making it an economical choice for driving enthusiasts.

Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents an array of petrol engines, ranging from 95 HP to a robust 150 HP, offering torque figures that peak at 250 Nm. The best performance of the T-Cross can achieve a 0 to 100 km/h time of 8.4 seconds, thanks to its effective dual-clutch automatic transmission. Its fuel consumption averages around 5.6 to 6 L/100 km, which is commendable for its class.

T-Cross

Driving Dynamics and Comfort

The CX-30 is equipped with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, enhancing traction and handling, particularly in adverse weather conditions. The suspension system is tuned for both comfort and agility, providing a driver-focused experience that remains smooth over various terrains. Additionally, the cabin is crafted with high-quality materials and a modern infotainment system, including a large display, smartphone connectivity, and advanced audio features.

In contrast, the T-Cross focuses on delivering a balanced ride with front-wheel drive. Its design includes a user-friendly infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones, ensuring connectivity on the road. While its ride may lean slightly more towards comfort than sportiness compared to the CX-30, the T-Cross provides ample headroom and legroom for all passengers, making it great for longer journeys.

CX-30

Safety Features and Innovations

Both SUVs come equipped with a suite of advanced safety features designed to protect occupants and assist drivers. The Mazda CX-30 offers the i-Activsense safety package, which includes adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and smart city brake support, all contributing to a secure driving experience.

The T-Cross also does not fall short in the safety department, featuring adaptive cruise control and emergency braking, among other driver assistance systems. The inclusion of these features in both vehicles highlights the car manufacturers' commitment to making the driving experience as safe as possible for everyone on the road.

T-Cross

Conclusion: Which SUV Wins?

Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Volkswagen T-Cross ultimately boils down to individual preferences and priorities. If you seek a vehicle that offers sporty dynamics, robust engine options, and an upscale interior, the Mazda CX-30 is the way to go. However, if you prefer a more compact size with excellent trunk space and family-friendly features, the VW T-Cross would be a commendable choice.

Both vehicles represent their brands well in the compact SUV market, but the decision will rely on what aspects of an SUV matter most to the buyer. As these models continue to evolve with the times, they remain iconic representations of their manufacturers' innovative spirit and commitment to quality.

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross is visibly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,311 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Cross delivers very slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is somewhat lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 188 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers marginally more boot space – 455 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries very slightly more – 496 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (8 Reviews)
rate
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the VW T‑Cross means deciding whether you want Toyota’s hybrid efficiency and nimble city manners or Volkswagen’s more conventional, spacious small SUV package. The Yaris Cross focuses on low running costs and urban agility, while the T‑Cross delivers a …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.