VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Master Transporter comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Master Transporter?

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Master Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Renault Master Transporter

  • slightly more power
  • marginally more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is visibly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,656 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Master Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Master Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Master Transporter offers slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Master Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-5 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is noticeably lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 499 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries significantly more – 1,846 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,245 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Master Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Master Transporter

Renault Master Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 177 - 448 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
serpimg_2EkqG5

Reviews Renault Master Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Mercedes Sprinter Bus
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Mercedes Sprinter Bus and Renault Master Transporter go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Opel Vivaro
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Opel Vivaro and Renault Master Transporter go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Opel Vivaro …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-5
VS
BYD Seal U and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Mazda CX-5 …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5
VS
Jaguar F-Pace and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jaguar F-Pace or the …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 318 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.