VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda CX-5 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • markedly lighter

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 is markedly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,923 £.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 199 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 441 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is markedly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 550 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 583 L. That’s a difference of about 2 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries a bit more – 601 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq present a compelling match-up in the growing electric SUV market, each offering an impressive blend of performance and versatility. While the Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and a robust powertrain, the Enyaq stands out with its strong emphasis on …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
601 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.