VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Suzuki S-Cross?

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers markedly more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 31 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is marginally faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Suzuki S-Cross tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-5 delivers barely more torque with 238 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 3 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is markedly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 349 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers markedly more boot space – 583 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 153 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 789 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 196 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7 - 7.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki’s compact crossover siblings square off: S-Cross vs Vitara. One leans practical and polished, the other flirts with adventure—let’s find out which Suzuki deserves your driveway and your fuel money.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross is the sensible family crossover: generous boot, honest equipment and wallet-friendly pricing that make it a practical pick if you prioritise space and value. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever city slicker — compact, refined, and available with efficient hybrid power and that …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
4,305 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
Payload
601 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.