VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Suzuki S-Cross?

Mazda CX-5 vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • barely more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki S-Cross is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers markedly more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 31 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-5 delivers barely more torque with 238 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 3 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is markedly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 349 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 196 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-5 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Mazda CX-5
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.