Compare performance (327 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 20,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Dacia Bigster?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the 2024 Mazda CX-60 and the 2025 Dacia Bigster present intriguing options for consumers. While both vehicles cater to the SUV market, they stand out with distinct features, capabilities, and innovations. Let’s delve into the specifics of each to see what sets them apart.
The Mazda CX-60 offers a choice between a Plug-in Hybrid engine and a Diesel Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine. With a formidable power range of up to 327 HP and torque reaching up to 550 Nm, the CX-60 guarantees a thrilling drive. Its electric range of 64 km and low fuel consumption of 1.4 L/100km for the hybrid make it a noteworthy choice for eco-conscious drivers.
On the other hand, the Dacia Bigster, a 2025 model, opts for more conventional powertrains with Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, and LPG options. The maximum available power is a modest 155 HP with a consumption rate starting as low as 4.7 L/100km. Though the Bigster’s acceleration from 0-100km/h in 9.7 seconds doesn’t quite match the CX-60’s brisk 5.8 seconds, it offers admirable efficiency and accessibility.
Mazda’s CX-60 impresses with its diverse drivetrain options, including both All-Wheel Drive and Rear-Wheel Drive configurations, catering to various driving preferences. A highlight is its cutting-edge automatic transmission, offering seamless gear transitions that enhance driving pleasure.
Meanwhile, the Dacia Bigster provides versatility with All-Wheel Drive and Front-Wheel Drive options. Primarily featuring a manual gearbox, with an automatic option available, the Bigster focuses on simplicity and reliability, aligning with Dacia's philosophy of affordability.
Both SUVs flaunt robust designs characteristic of the segment. The Mazda CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length, delivering a spacious environment with ample legroom and a trunk capacity of 570 L. Its aerodynamic structure and refined styling exude a premium vibe.
Conversely, the Bigster’s more compact 4570 mm length ensures easier maneuverability, coupled with a commendable trunk capacity of up to 667 L for practical use. It strikes a balance between utility and agility with a minimalist design approach.
In terms of CO2 efficiency, the CX-60 shines in its class with figures as low as 31 g/km, reflecting Mazda’s commitment to reducing environmental impact through advanced hybrid technology.
While the Bigster lags slightly behind in emissions, starting at 106 g/km, it compensates with its eco-friendly full hybrid and LPG variants, aiming to lower its environmental footprint within the class confines.
Deciding between the Mazda CX-60 and the Dacia Bigster ultimately hinges on what you prioritize in an SUV. The CX-60 appeals to those seeking cutting-edge technology and superior performance wrapped in a luxurious package. Conversely, the Dacia Bigster offers practicality and efficiency, ideal for budget-conscious individuals valuing substance over style.
Both the Mazda CX-60 and the Dacia Bigster showcase how diverse the SUV segment can be, catering to a wide spectrum of preferences. Whether it’s technological prowess or pragmatic value, both models stand prepared to navigate the roads ahead.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Dacia Bigster is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,109 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Dacia Bigster with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Dacia Bigster takes 9.7 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Dacia Bigster is markedly lighter – 1,425 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 465 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Dacia Bigster offers somewhat more boot space – 667 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries noticeably more – 612 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 147 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
The Bigster is poised to redefine the SUV segment with its bold design and spacious interior, catering to the needs of both families and adventure seekers alike. Emphasizing sustainability and practicality, this model reflects a modern approach to automotive engineering, making it a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers. With its striking presence on the road, the Bigster not only captures attention but also embodies a new era of versatile mobility.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
20,600 - 28,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
106 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,425 - 1,611 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
546 - 667 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,813 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
434 - 465 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, LPG
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
230 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,799 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España