Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes Vito Bus comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 36,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes Vito Bus?
Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes Vito Bus: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes Vito Bus is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,341 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Bus with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers considerably more range – reaching up to 370 km, about 307 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Vito Bus
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers marginally more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is very slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,023 kg. The difference is around 133 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers clearly more boot space – 1,390 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 820 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Bus carries considerably more – 1,077 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 465 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Vito Bus is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,300
Mercedes Vito Bus
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes Vito Bus
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Mercedes Vito Bus
The Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.
details
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes Vito Bus
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 228 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
8
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,890 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.