VS

Mazda CX-60 vs NIO ET5 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or NIO ET5?

Mazda CX-60 vs NIO ET5: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

NIO ET5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

NIO ET5 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,957 £.

As for electric range, the NIO ET5 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 590 km, about 527 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

ET5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET5 offers noticeably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET5 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO ET5 delivers markedly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is somewhat lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,215 kg. The difference is around 325 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers markedly more boot space – 570 L compared to 386 L. That’s a difference of about 184 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries markedly more – 612 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The NIO ET5 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
ET5

NIO ET5

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.6 - 18.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 456 - 590 km
Mazda CX-60
NIO ET5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

NIO ET5

NIO ET5 arrives with sleek, minimalist lines and a cabin that feels more like a calm lounge than a dashboard, delivering a composed drive that keeps motorway monotony at bay. Tech is smart rather than showy, and the brand’s novel ownership options make it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric convenience without the usual headaches — plus it brings enough personality to make charging stops less boring.

details
Mazda CX-60
NIO ET5

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
40,700 - 58,700 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.6 - 18.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
456 - 590 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,215 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
386 L
Length
-
Length
4,790 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Height
-
Height
1,499 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,135 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
455 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
490 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
700 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
NIO
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.