VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Nissan Qashqai?

Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-60

The rapidly evolving automotive landscape presents consumers with a plethora of choices, especially in the competitive compact SUV segment. Two standout vehicles vying for attention are the Mazda CX-60 and the Nissan Qashqai. Each brings unique features, cutting-edge technology, and performance capabilities that cater to different preferences. In this article, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two models, examining various technical aspects and innovations.

Qashqai

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-60 showcases a bold and sporty design characterized by its dynamic, sleek lines and a muscular stance. With a length of 4745 mm, width of 1890 mm, and a height ranging from 1680 mm to 1688 mm, it offers a substantial presence on the road. The five-door layout seamlessly blends aesthetics with functionality, ensuring ample cabin space for passengers and cargo.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai, measuring 4425 mm in length and 1835 mm in width while standing at 1625 mm in height, presents a more compact and agile silhouette. Also featuring a five-door configuration, it is ideal for urban environments where maneuverability is key. The Qashqai’s design emphasizes modern lines and a refined front fascia, appealing to a wide demographic.

CX-60

Powertrains and Performance

The Mazda CX-60 offers an array of engine options, including a powerful 327 HP plug-in hybrid system, a diesel MHEV with up to 200 HP, and a potent 254 HP gasoline variant. Coupled with advanced automatic transmissions, the CX-60 provides a seamless driving experience across varying terrains. Notably, the plug-in hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, catering to eco-conscious drivers.

In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is equipped with petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, producing power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 190 HP. With a choice of manual and automatic transmissions (CVT), the Qashqai is designed for both performance and efficiency. The acceleration figures reveal that while the Qashqai can achieve 0-100 km/h in as fast as 7.9 seconds, it traditionally lags behind the CX-60’s top-performing models.

Qashqai

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Mazda CX-60 shines with dramatically low figures, particularly in its hybrid variant, which achieves an astounding 1.4 L/100km. The diesel variant also performs admirably, consuming around 5 L/100km. This efficiency contributes significantly to its lower emissions, with CO2 figures starting from just 31 g/km.

The Nissan Qashqai's fuel consumption ranges from 5.1 to 6.8 L/100km, depending on the selected engine and configuration. Its emissions range between 116 g/km and 154 g/km, indicating that while it is efficient, it does not quite match the CX-60 in this regard.

CX-60

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles impress with their interiors, highlighting modern design, quality materials, and advanced technology. The CX-60 boasts a spacious cabin with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, providing ample room for luggage and everyday items. Technological innovations include a user-friendly infotainment system and advanced driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and comfort.

Similarly, the Nissan Qashqai offers a comfortable interior with refined finishes and practicality. The trunk space measures between 479 and 504 liters, accommodating various cargo needs. The Qashqai stands out with its cutting-edge technology, offering a comprehensive suite of safety features and an intuitive infotainment system to keep drivers connected.

Qashqai

Driving Experience

The Mazda CX-60 is constructed with a focus on engaging driving dynamics, delivering exceptional handling thanks to its rear-wheel drive layout in some variants and advanced all-wheel drive options. It caters to enthusiasts looking for a spirited and responsive driving experience, especially with its acceleration capabilities, reaching 0-100 km/h in as quick as 5.8 seconds.

Conversely, the Nissan Qashqai, while providing a composed ride, emphasizes comfort and practicality over sportiness. Its handling is surprisingly responsive for its segment, with various driving modes allowing drivers to tailor the experience based on road conditions. However, it does not exhibit the same level of athleticism as the CX-60.

CX-60

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Mazda CX-60 and Nissan Qashqai offer compelling options within the compact SUV market. The CX-60 excels in terms of performance, efficiency, and driving engagement, making it an enticing option for those seeking a robust driving experience. In contrast, the Qashqai prioritizes comfort and urban practicality, appealing to a broader audience seeking a reliable daily driver.

Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences—whether one desires a sportier drive with advanced hybrid technology or a comfortably equipped SUV tailored for everyday ease. Both models undoubtedly deliver exceptional value in their respective niches.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Qashqai is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,066 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is clearly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 470 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers somewhat more boot space – 570 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries slightly more – 612 kg compared to 516 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details
Mazda CX-60
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

details
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_005
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_001
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_011
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_032
Nissan_Qashqai_4X4_022

Reviews Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Grandland
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels sharper on the road with refined handling and clever packaging, while the Opel Grandland answers with a roomier cabin and bolder looks that’ll please practical families. Pick the Qashqai for polished tech and a composed daily drive, choose the Grandland if you want more …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai feels like the classier, more refined compact crossover—crisper handling, a plush interior and sharper infotainment—while the Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible rival, offering rock-solid reliability, excellent economy and no-nonsense practicality that will age well. If you …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and Opel Mokka are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on roomy practicality and comfortable family motoring, while the Mokka favours bold styling and nimble city driving. Below I'll outline the key differences in space, driving feel, …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Austral
VS
Pick the Nissan Qashqai if you want a composed, easy-to-live-with compact SUV that feels refined and sensible on running costs; choose the Renault Austral if you crave a roomier, more stylish cabin with sharper tech and hybrid efficiency. Both have their charms — Qashqai is the safe, comfortable …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
98 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,624 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
446 - 516 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
158 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
260 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
116 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.