VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Austral comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 200 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 29,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Renault Austral?

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Austral: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

Renault Austral

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Austral is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,757 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Renault Austral with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Austral

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 127 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.4 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is clearly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 342 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers marginally more boot space – 570 L compared to 527 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries clearly more – 612 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
If you want a sensible, well-rounded family SUV you can actually drive home today, the Renault Austral is the clear choice — comfortable, efficient and unfussy. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a futuristic concept car full of show-stopping ideas and tech, perfect for gawking at motor shows but …
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room …
Mazda CX-60
Renault Austral

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Austral

The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.

details
r220291p
r220293p
r220394p
r221062p
r221121p
r221115p

Reviews Renault Austral

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Kia Sportage
Renault Austral
VS
The Kia Sportage is the sensible, value-packed family SUV — comfortable, practical and a reliable all-rounder — while the Renault Austral plays the style card with a sharper interior, clever hybrid tech and more upmarket flair. Pick the Sportage for straightforward practicality and a friendlier …
Renault Austral
Renault Scénic
VS
In the battle of the Renault Austral versus the Renault Scénic, both models showcase the brand's flair for innovation and versatility. The Austral stands out with its sleek SUV design and advanced tech features, catering to a more adventurous lifestyle. Meanwhile, the Scénic continues to impress as …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-60 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Peugeot 3008
Renault Austral
VS
The Peugeot 3008 brings sharper styling, a premium-feeling interior and a slightly more engaging drive thanks to its taut chassis and characterful engines, while the Renault Austral focuses on spacious practicality, comfort and simpler, friendlier tech. Both offer efficient hybrid variants, but …
Ford Kuga
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga and Renault Austral stand out with their distinctive designs and advanced technology. The Kuga impresses with its dynamic driving experience and strong performance, while the Austral offers a comfortable ride with an emphasis on eco-friendly …
Renault Austral
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle between the Renault Austral and the Renault Captur, the Austral impresses with its larger size and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more spacious family SUV. Meanwhile, the Captur continues to stand out with its compact design and exceptional maneuverability, making …
Mazda CX-60
Renault Austral

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
109 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
527 L
Length
-
Length
4,533 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
1,645 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
455 - 477 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.