VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Master Transporter comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Renault Master Transporter?

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Master Transporter: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

Renault Master Transporter

  • a bit cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Master Transporter is a bit cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,024 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter offers clearly more range – reaching up to 448 km, about 385 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Master Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 7.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is moderately lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 238 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries considerably more – 1,846 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,234 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (10 Reviews)
rate
Nikola
4 Aug 2026, 09:35:09

The car is simply fantastic. The torque is unbelievable. Acceleration is mesmerizing for an SUV. The interior has a premium feel. The only thing that would make it better is a longer EV range. Otherwise, perfect.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
serpimg_2EkqG5

Reviews Renault Master Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Lexus NX or the Mazda CX-60 …
Mercedes Sprinter Bus
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Mercedes Sprinter Bus and Renault Master Transporter go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the …
Mercedes Sprinter Transporter
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In this head-to-head transporter showdown, the Mercedes Sprinter and Renault Master prove to be two formidable contenders in the commercial vehicle market. The Mercedes Sprinter is renowned for its luxurious interiors and advanced safety features, making it a favorite for businesses that prioritize …
Peugeot Boxer
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In the competitive world of commercial vehicles, the Peugeot Boxer and Renault Master Transporter stand out as top contenders. Both vans offer impressive cargo space and versatile configurations, catering to a variety of business needs. While the Boxer is praised for its nimble handling and fuel …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Mazda CX-60
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 318 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.