VS

Mazda CX-6e vs Renault Scénic comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or Renault Scénic?

Mazda CX-6e vs Renault Scénic: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

  • slightly more power
details

Renault Scénic

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • noticeably lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Scénic is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,220 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Scénic is slightly more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers slightly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 114 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

Scénic

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers slightly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.9 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Scénic delivers very slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Scénic is noticeably lighter – 1,822 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 383 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Scénic offers moderately more boot space – 545 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Scénic carries markedly more – 518 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Scénic is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,600
Scénic

Renault Scénic

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 170 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 420 - 598 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Mazda CX-6e
Renault Scénic

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Scénic

The Renault Scenic is a practical and comfortable family car that prioritises interior flexibility and everyday usability. With a composed ride and clever storage solutions, it suits buyers who want a versatile, easy-to-live-with vehicle for family duties and daily driving.

details
r161217p
r161213p
r161215p
r161242p
r161196p

Reviews Renault Scénic

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
David
19 May 2026, 08:25:28

Better finishes, physical controls, European build, ride quality, soundproofing, better seats, etc.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
CUPRA Tavascan
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan and Mazda CX-6e offer distinct approaches to the electric crossover: the Tavascan leans into sporty performance and bold styling, while the CX-6e prioritizes Mazda’s refined design and everyday usability. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, range and practicality to help …
VW ID.4
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The VW ID.4 and the Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover: the ID.4 leans on roomy practicality and straightforward tech, while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s styling and driving feel to an electrified package. This comparison will cover range and charging, driving …
Mazda CX-6e
Renault Scénic

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
545 L
Length
-
Length
4,470 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,571 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
Payload
385 kg
Payload
514 - 518 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.