VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Bentley Continental Convertible comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 549 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 212,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Bentley Continental Convertible?

Mazda CX-80 vs Bentley Continental Convertible: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Bentley Continental Convertible

  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Bentley Continental Convertible costs 212,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 162,900 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Bentley Continental Convertible with 12.1 L/100km. The difference is about 8.1 L/100km.

Continental Convertible

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Bentley Continental Convertible offers clearly more power – delivering 549 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 222 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Bentley Continental Convertible is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Bentley Continental Convertible delivers visibly more torque with 770 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is marginally lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,335 kg. The difference is around 204 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers barely more boot space – 258 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 185 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
Mazda CX-80
Bentley Continental Convertible

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Bentley Continental Convertible

The Bentley Continental GTC is the ultimate cruising companion, wrapping you in hand-stitched leather and hushed luxury while the roof folds away for sun-drenched grand tours. It’s impossibly accomplished — poised and surprisingly playful for its size — delivering an effortless presence that turns every motorway into a first-class runway.

details
Mazda CX-80
Bentley Continental Convertible

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
212,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
12.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
275 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
90 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Convertible
Seats
7
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
2
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,335 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
235 L
Length
-
Length
4,850 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
1,399 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
465 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
549 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
318 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
770 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
404 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
3,996 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2019
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Bentley
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.