VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Ferrari Roma Convertible comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 620 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 207,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Ferrari Roma Convertible?

Mazda CX-80 vs Ferrari Roma Convertible: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
details

Ferrari Roma Convertible

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Ferrari Roma Convertible costs 207,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 158,371 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ferrari Roma Convertible with 10.3 L/100km. The difference is about 6.3 L/100km.

Roma Convertible

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari Roma Convertible offers considerably more power – delivering 620 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 293 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari Roma Convertible is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari Roma Convertible delivers clearly more torque with 760 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari Roma Convertible is clearly lighter – 1,654 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 477 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ferrari Roma Convertible offers barely more boot space – 272 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Ferrari Roma Convertible

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari Roma Convertible

The Ferrari Roma Spider dresses the marque’s drama in a restrained, almost polite suit, folding its roof away to reveal a cabin that feels as civilized as it does intoxicating. Behind the wheel it serves grand touring manners with a playful shove and soundtrack, perfect for drivers who want thrilling Ferrari emotion without the daily fuss.

details
serpimg_XehzDq

Reviews Ferrari Roma Convertible

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-80 showcases a more compact and refined design aimed at urban drivers, whereas the Toyota Land Cruiser remains the robust choice for off-road adventurers. The CX-80 offers superior fuel efficiency and a technology-rich interior, ensuring a comfortable ride …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Ferrari Roma Convertible

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
207,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
10.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
234 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Convertible
Seats
7
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
2
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,654 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
272 L
Length
-
Length
4,656 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,974 mm
Height
-
Height
1,306 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
620 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
320 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
760 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
456 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
3,855 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ferrari
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.