VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 85,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Jeep Grand Cherokee?

Mazda CX-80 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly more electric range
  • a bit lighter
details

Jeep Grand Cherokee

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36,300 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses 2.9 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 15 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Grand Cherokee

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers somewhat more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Grand Cherokee is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Grand Cherokee delivers moderately more torque with 637 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 87 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is a bit lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 303 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers considerably more boot space – 520 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 262 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries very slightly more – 650 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Jeep Grand Cherokee

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Grand Cherokee

The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

details
foto18-620d0d79532b9_620dfd913fa92
FOTO 1
FOTO 9
FOTO 48

Reviews Jeep Grand Cherokee

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
Omoda 9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and Omoda 9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the Omoda 9 is …
Jeep Grand Cherokee
SsangYong Rexton
VS
Jeep Grand Cherokee and SsangYong Rexton go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Jeep Grand …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Jeep Grand Cherokee

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
85,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
45 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
65 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,434 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
520 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,968 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
641 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
380 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
637 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
280 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Jeep
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.