Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-80 meets Land Rover Defender.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-80 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Land Rover Defender costs 57900 £. That’s a price difference of around 9643 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Defender with 6 L. The difference is about 4.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – achieving up to 61 km, about 13 km more than the Land Rover Defender.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Defender has a significantly edge – offering 635 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 308 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Defender is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Defender performs somewhat better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-80 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Defender pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Defender offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 8 vs 7.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is barely noticeable lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2300 kg. The difference is around 169 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Defender offers decisively more room – 786 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 528 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Defender performs slight better – up to 2078 L, which is about 107 L more than the Mazda CX-80.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Defender evident takes the win – 819 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 169 kg.
Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.
detailsThe Land Rover Defender boasts a rugged design that seamlessly blends traditional aesthetics with modern innovation, making it a true icon in the world of off-road vehicles. Its performance capabilities are matched by a luxurious interior, offering comfort and cutting-edge technology for drivers and passengers alike. Whether tackling rough terrains or cruising through city streets, the Defender exudes versatility and reliability, maintaining its reputation as a robust yet refined companion for any adventure.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
Price
57900 - 172000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6 - 14.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
Electric Range
48 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
co2
135 - 324 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
89 - 91 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
2 - 8
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
3 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
Curb weight
2300 - 2745 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
293 - 786 L
|
|
Length
4995 mm
|
Length
4323 - 5358 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
2008 mm
|
|
Height
1714 mm
|
Height
1967 - 1995 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 - 2078 L
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
494 - 819 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 750 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.