Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Defender comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 635 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Land Rover Defender?
Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Defender: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-80 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Land Rover Defender costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,529 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Land Rover Defender with 6 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 12 km more than the Land Rover Defender.
Defender
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Defender offers significantly more power – delivering 635 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 308 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Defender is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Defender delivers noticeably more torque with 750 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Defender offers more seats – 8 vs 7.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is only slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,300 kg. The difference is around 169 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Defender offers clearly more boot space – 786 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 528 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Defender carries visibly more – 819 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 169 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Defender is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £57,900
Land Rover Defender
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Defender
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Land Rover Defender
The Land Rover Defender looks like it could shrug off a weekend of serious off-road abuse while still turning heads on the high street. Inside it balances practical, no-nonsense utility with enough creature comforts to make daily driving feel less like an expedition and more like a stylish commute—rugged charm with civilized manners.
details
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Defender
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
57,900 - 172,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6 - 14.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
48 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
135 - 324 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
2 - 8
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
2,300 - 2,745 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
293 - 786 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
2,008 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
494 - 819 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 635 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 750 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 467 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.