VS

Mazda CX-80 vs NIO ET7 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 59,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or NIO ET7?

Mazda CX-80 vs NIO ET7: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

NIO ET7

  • considerably more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the NIO ET7 costs 59,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,586 £.

As for electric range, the NIO ET7 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 584 km, about 524 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

ET7

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET7 offers considerably more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 326 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET7 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO ET7 delivers clearly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is a bit lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 303 kg.

Looking at boot space, the NIO ET7 offers markedly more boot space – 363 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 184 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The NIO ET7 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £59,900
ET7

NIO ET7

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 653 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 451 - 584 km
Mazda CX-80
NIO ET7

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

NIO ET7

The NIO ET7 arrives like a calm thunderstorm — sleek, silent and unapologetically clever, turning motorway cruising into the sort of effortless glide that makes other cars feel noisy and rehearsed. Inside, it's all luxury sofas and smart gadgets that actually help rather than confuse, so buyers who crave tech and comfort will feel like they've upgraded their life without needing to spellcheck the manual.

details
Mazda CX-80
NIO ET7

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
59,900 - 68,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
19 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
451 - 584 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,434 - 2,454 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
363 L
Length
-
Length
5,101 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,987 mm
Height
-
Height
1,509 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
446 - 466 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
653 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
850 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
480 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
NIO
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.