VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 29,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Nissan Townstar Compact Van?

Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably more efficient
details

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Townstar Compact Van is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,871 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Townstar Compact Van with 6.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 263 km, about 203 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Townstar Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers substantially more torque with 550 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar Compact Van is significantly lighter – 1,399 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 732 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van carries a bit more – 775 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
Mazda CX-80
Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

The Nissan Townstar is a smart, no-nonsense compact van that makes city running and tight deliveries feel almost effortless thanks to tidy packaging and clever storage. It keeps things sensible on the wallet and the road, offering a comfortable driving position and useful tech without flashy frills — the kind of workhorse you'll actually enjoy parking at the kerb.

details
Mazda CX-80
Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
29,500 - 37,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
263 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
7
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,399 - 1,908 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
571 - 775 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.