Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot 2008 comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Peugeot 2008?
Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot 2008: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Peugeot 2008 is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,566 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 2008 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 405 km, about 345 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
2008
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 171 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is substantially lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 868 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers significantly more boot space – 434 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 176 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 203 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 2008 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £24,800
Peugeot 2008
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 2008
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Peugeot 2008
The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.
details
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 2008
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.