VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot 308 SW comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 195 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Peugeot 308 SW?

Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot 308 SW: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Peugeot 308 SW

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot 308 SW is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,208 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 308 SW uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 308 SW offers substantially more range – reaching up to 444 km, about 384 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

308 SW

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 195 HP. That’s roughly 132 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Peugeot 308 SW takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 308 SW is substantially lighter – 1,484 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 647 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 308 SW offers clearly more boot space – 551 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 293 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 508 kg. That’s a difference of about 142 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 308 SW stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,100
308 SW

Peugeot 308 SW

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 131 - 195 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 81 - 444 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 308
Peugeot 308 SW
VS
Peugeot 308 vs 308 SW: same sharp styling and crisp, comfy drive, but the SW stretches its legs with estate-car practicality—think a boot well over 600 liters versus the hatch’s ~400. If you love the look and a nimble feel, go hatch; if school runs, flat-packs, and weekend escapes beckon, the SW is …
Peugeot 308 SW
Peugeot 408
VS
Peugeot's 308 SW and 408 both blend style with practicality but take different approaches: the 308 SW is a traditional estate focused on cargo flexibility, while the 408 uses a fastback, raised profile for a more coupe‑like, SUV‑tinged look. This comparison looks at interior space, driving …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 308 SW

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot 308 SW

The Peugeot 308 SW blends French flair with estate practicality, dressing up daily chores in a surprisingly handsome package. Inside it's cleverly laid out and comfortable, and the composed, entertaining drive makes family duty feel a little less like a chore.

details
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 125
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 173
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 5
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 145
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 322

Reviews Peugeot 308 SW

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GT
6 Dec 2025, 17:50:57

Great car with a smooth ride. I have 308 SW GT, with the 180HP PHEV engine

pierre
29 Nov 2025, 17:19:44

150,000 km in 2 years — SW BlueHDi 1.5L 30cv. Comfortable, excellent gearbox. Maybe a bit noisy on the motorway, with air noise around the front doors. A slightly punchier engine would be welcome. The entire timing system was replaced under warranty at 110,000 km.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 308 SW
Peugeot 508 SW
VS
Two very different Peugeots go estate-to-estate: the practical, city-friendly Peugeot 308 SW versus the sleeker, more upmarket Peugeot 508 SW. We'll separate pure practicality from premium flair, weigh space, comfort and running costs — and tell you which one deserves a spot on your driveway.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 308 SW
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the stylish compact SUV that lifts you up for a confident drive and lots of road presence, while the Peugeot 308 SW is the clever estate that quietly carries more luggage and rewards you with sharper, more car-like handling. Pick the 3008 if you want a comfy, SUV look-and-feel; …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308 SW
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 SW comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with city-friendly agility or a larger estate built for cargo space and long-distance comfort. The 2008 excels at efficiency, maneuverability and a raised driving position, while the 308 SW …
Opel Astra Sports Tourer
Peugeot 308 SW
VS
In the compact estate segment, the Opel Astra Sports Tourer and the Peugeot 308 SW both offer compelling choices, each with its distinct attributes. The Astra Sports Tourer is renowned for its spacious interior and tech-savvy features, providing a comfortable ride for families and professionals …
Peugeot 308 SW
Renault Symbioz
VS
In an intriguing comparison between the Peugeot 308 SW and the Renault Symbioz, both models showcase distinct approaches to blending practicality with innovative design. While the Peugeot 308 SW offers a spacious interior and efficient performance, the Renault Symbioz stands out with its futuristic …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 308 SW

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
30,100 - 43,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
81 - 444 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 134 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,484 - 1,783 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
467 - 551 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,852 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
417 - 508 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
96 - 143 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.