VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Polestar 4 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 544 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 53,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Polestar 4?

Mazda CX-80 vs Polestar 4: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

Polestar 4

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Polestar 4 costs 53,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,729 £.

As for electric range, the Polestar 4 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 560 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

4

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 offers visibly more power – delivering 544 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 217 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 4 delivers moderately more torque with 686 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 136 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is only slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,230 kg. The difference is around 99 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Polestar 4 offers clearly more boot space – 526 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 4 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,100
4

Polestar 4

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.8 - 18.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 590 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Polestar 4
Volvo EX60
VS
Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with …
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Polestar 4 and Zeekr 7 GT represent two different approaches to the modern premium EV coupe-SUV: Polestar brings Scandinavian restraint and driver-focused dynamics, while the Zeekr emphasizes tech-rich features and value-packed performance. This comparison cuts through specs and marketing to show …
Mazda CX-80
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

details
7458E184-FE1C-49CD-8688-8D9AD87DD167
3ACA6B65-1C98-412F-9D32-588E078B6285
3634B075-6672-406F-B1C3-46F68F4A8DD7

Reviews Polestar 4

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 19:23:48

The Polestar 4 has a very attractive design that doesn’t go unnoticed.
The interior is elegant, comfortable and finished with good materials.
Easy to drive, great grip on the tarmac and strong acceleration.
For the price, there are things to improve to be competitive with other brands of equal quality and technology; it needs meaningful upgrades — e.g., better driving ADAS, true autonomous parking and the ability to move the car remotely if you can’t get inside. Improving charging times is essential, and not having a rear window while relying on a camera in the interior mirror shouldn’t be a cause for concern. Otherwise, a spectacular car with a gorgeous design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Polestar 4
Polestar 5
VS
Polestar 4 and Polestar 5 are sibling EVs with shared design DNA but different missions: the Polestar 4 is a compact coupe‑SUV aimed at style and everyday practicality, while the Polestar 5 is a larger four‑door gran turismo focused on performance, range and long‑distance comfort. This comparison …
Polestar 3
Polestar 4
VS
Polestar 3 is the grown‑up grand tourer of the pair — a spacious, plush coupe‑SUV that favours comfort, range and open‑road refinement. The Polestar 4, by contrast, trades some rear‑seat space for sleeker styling, sharper handling and a friendlier price tag, making it the sportier, more city‑savvy …
BYD Seal
Polestar 4
VS
Meet the BYD Seal — a tech-packed, value-driven challenger — and the Polestar 4, the sleek Swedish upstart angling for premium credibility. We pit Seal vs Polestar 4 to find out which one delivers the sharper blend of range, performance and everyday usability, and which should earn a spot in your …
Polestar 2
Polestar 4
VS
Polestar 2 is the compact, drivers‑first EV — nimble, practical and hard‑working for daily commutes — while the Polestar 4 ups the ante with coupe‑SUV looks, more interior space and a higher‑spec feel that commands a premium. If you want sharp handling and better value, choose the 2; if you crave …
Polestar 4
Alpine A390
VS
Polestar 4 and Alpine A390 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
BMW i4
Polestar 4
VS
The BMW i4 is the driver's EV — taut handling, rear‑drive poise and a cockpit that still feels satisfyingly analogue — while the Polestar 4 plays the Scandinavian minimalist card, pairing bold coupe‑SUV looks with luxurious simplicity and polished electric range. Choose the i4 if you want …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Polestar 4
ZEEKR 7X
VS
In the compact coupe‑SUV duel, the Polestar 4 brings Scandinavian minimalism, focused handling and a premium EV feel, while the ZEEKR 7X punches back with full‑size practicality, wall‑to‑wall screens and impressive range-for-the-money. Choose the Polestar 4 if you want a sporty, design-led electric …
Mazda CX-80
Polestar 4

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
53,100 - 59,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,230 - 2,355 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
526 L
Length
-
Length
4,840 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,008 mm
Height
-
Height
1,534 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,536 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Polestar
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.