VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Octavia Limousine comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Octavia Limousine?

Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Octavia Limousine: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • only slightly more efficient
details

Skoda Octavia Limousine

  • considerably cheaper
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Octavia Limousine is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,351 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Limousine with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Octavia Limousine

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Limousine is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.6 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Limousine is considerably lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 780 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Limousine offers clearly more boot space – 600 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 342 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Octavia Limousine

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Octavia Limousine

The Skoda Octavia Limousine blends space and sensible charm into a calm, grown-up package that feels smarter than its modest badge suggests. Practical, comfortable and quietly clever, it's the sort of car that makes everyday driving feel noticeably less mundane and keeps both your wallet and patience intact.

details
SKODA OCTAVIA Dynamisch_116156
SKODA OCTAVIA Dynamisch_116146
SKODA OCTAVIA Dynamisch_116157
SKODA OCTAVIA Interieur_116221
SKODA OCTAVIA Details_116175

Reviews Skoda Octavia Limousine

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Octavia Limousine
VS
Ford Kuga and Skoda Octavia Limousine go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-80 showcases a more compact and refined design aimed at urban drivers, whereas the Toyota Land Cruiser remains the robust choice for off-road adventurers. The CX-80 offers superior fuel efficiency and a technology-rich interior, ensuring a comfortable ride …
Mazda CX-80
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Octavia Limousine

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
25,000 - 39,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
111 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,537 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
600 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
503 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.6 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.