VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo S90 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 62,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Volvo S90?

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo S90: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
details

Volvo S90

  • markedly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is markedly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Volvo S90 costs 62,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,900 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S90 uses 0.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo S90 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 89 km, about 29 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

S90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S90 offers markedly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.7 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S90 delivers noticeably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo S90 is slightly lighter – 1,912 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 219 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo S90 offers substantially more boot space – 453 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 195 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 132 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo S90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £62,200
S90

Volvo S90

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 235 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.8 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 89 km
Mazda CX-80
Volvo S90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Volvo S90

The Volvo S90 is a composed, elegant luxury sedan that dresses Scandinavian restraint in a quietly imposing package. It prioritises serene highway manners and a calm, tech‑savvy cabin, making it a car that suggests you deserve the nicer things in life without ever raising its voice.

details
Mazda CX-80
Volvo S90

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
62,200 - 70,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
89 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
17 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,912 - 2,119 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
431 - 453 L
Length
-
Length
4,969 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
1,440 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
451 - 518 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
235 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
480 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
173 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.