VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Dacia Spring comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 102 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 14,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Dacia Spring?

Mazda MX-30 vs Dacia Spring: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Dacia Spring

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Dacia Spring is considerably cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,363 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Dacia Spring is considerably more efficient: consuming 12.4 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 5.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Dacia Spring offers substantially more range – reaching up to 225 km, about 140 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

Spring

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers clearly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda MX-30 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.1 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda MX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is considerably lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 779 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda MX-30 offers a bit more boot space – 350 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda MX-30 carries markedly more – 402 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 128 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Dacia Spring is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £14,500
Spring

Dacia Spring

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 70 - 102 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 221 - 225 km
Mazda MX-30
Dacia Spring

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details

Dacia Spring

The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.

details
Mazda MX-30
Dacia Spring

Costs and Consumption

Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,070 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
308 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,583 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
274 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
137 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Dacia
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.