What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-5 Roadster have?

The Mazda MX-5 Roadster is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda MX-5 Roadster's engine?

Depending on the version, the Mazda MX-5 Roadster delivers up to 132 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda MX-5 Roadster according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.20 L.

What is the top speed of the Mazda MX-5 Roadster?

The Mazda MX-5 Roadster reaches up to 204 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda MX-5 Roadster?

Overall, the Mazda MX-5 Roadster is 3915 mm long, 1735 mm wide and 1225 mm high.

Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the VW T-Roc according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.50 L.

How fast can the VW T-Roc go?

The VW T-Roc reaches up to 212 km/h.

What is the VW T-Roc’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 475 L fit inside.

How big is the VW T-Roc overall?

The VW T-Roc measures 4271 mm long, 1811 mm wide and 1527 mm high.

Mazda MX-5 Roadster vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-5 Roadster @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Roc has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Mazda MX-5 Roadster costs 28400 £. That’s a price difference of around 2010 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Roc manages with 5.50 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Mazda MX-5 Roadster with 6.20 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc has a somewhat edge – offering 150 HP compared to 132 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda MX-5 Roadster is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda MX-5 Roadster tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 152 Nm. That’s about 98 Nm difference.

MX-5 Roadster @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: VW T-Roc offers clearly more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, Mazda MX-5 Roadster is clearly perceptible lighter – 1078 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 387 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers convincingly more room – 475 L compared to 130 L. That’s a difference of about 345 L.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc significantly takes the win – 515 kg compared to 152 kg. That’s a difference of about 363 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW T-Roc proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW T-Roc is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda MX-5 Roadster

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …

Costs and Consumption
Price 28400 - 33800 £	Price 26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km 6.20 L	Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 140 g/km	co2 126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Roadster	Body Type SUV
Seats 2	Seats 4 - 5
Doors 2	Doors 2 - 5
Curb weight 1078 kg	Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity 130 L	Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L
Length 3915 mm	Length 4271 - 4373 mm
Width 1735 mm	Width 1811 - 1828 mm
Height 1225 mm	Height 1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1350 L
Payload 152 kg	Payload 368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 132 HP	Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.30 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed 204 km/h	Max Speed 187 - 212 km/h
Torque 152 Nm	Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 97 kW	Power kW 85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1496 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3