VS

Mercedes AMG GT vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (816 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (102,500 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes AMG GT or Renault Clio?

Mercedes AMG GT vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Mercedes AMG GT

  • substantially more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

AMG GT

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mercedes AMG GT costs 102,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 85,447 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mercedes AMG GT with 10.3 L/100km. The difference is about 6.2 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes AMG GT offers substantially more power – delivering 816 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 658 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes AMG GT is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes AMG GT delivers clearly more torque with 1,420 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 1,230 Nm more.

AMG GT

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is clearly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,790 kg. The difference is around 588 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers only slightly more boot space – 327 L compared to 321 L. That’s a difference of about 6 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries substantially more – 463 kg compared to 215 kg. That’s a difference of about 248 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Mercedes AMG GT
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes AMG GT

The Mercedes-AMG GT is a theatrical sports car with prowling looks and an aggressive exhaust note that announces its intentions the moment it fires up. It pairs ferocious performance with surprising everyday usability — a taut yet forgiving chassis and a cockpit that feels special — making sensible buyers suddenly very good at justifying indulgence.

details

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
Mercedes AMG GT
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

Price
102,500 - 194,400 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
10.3 - 14 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
11 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
235 - 319 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,790 - 2,195 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
182 - 321 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,929 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
170 - 215 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
435 - 816 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 - 4.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 1,420 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
320 - 600 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,991 - 3,982 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.