VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Renault Clio?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • clearly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,428 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers clearly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Marco Polo is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers considerably more torque with 500 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is considerably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 1,248 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers substantially more boot space – 670 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 343 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 187 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
serpimg_rTvtWU

Reviews Mercedes Marco Polo

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Kia Picanto
Renault Clio
VS
The Kia Picanto and Renault Clio are popular choices in the small-car market, but they suit different needs: the Picanto excels as an ultra-compact, easy-to-park city car with strong value, while the Clio offers more space, refinement and equipment for everyday family use. If you prioritise low …
Renault Clio
Toyota Corolla
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Renault Clio impresses with its agile urban performance, chic design, and advanced infotainment features, making it a favorite among city dwellers. On the other hand, the Toyota Corolla stands out with its unmatched reliability, spacious interior, and superior …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Peugeot 208
Renault Clio
VS
The Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio are two of Europe’s leading superminis, each blending attractive design, efficient engines, and practical dimensions for everyday driving. This short comparison will highlight their key differences in styling, cabin quality, driving dynamics, tech and running costs …
Renault Clio
SEAT Arona
VS
Renault Clio and SEAT Arona go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Clio or the SEAT …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
5,140 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Marco Polo?

The Mercedes Marco Polo is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.