VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs VW T-Roc – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or VW T-Roc?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57500 £. That’s a price difference of around 31047 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW T-Roc manages with 5.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.40 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 237 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Marco Polo is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes Marco Polo performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 220 km/h, while the VW T-Roc tops out at 212 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Marco Polo pulls clearly stronger with 500 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: VW T-Roc offers a bit more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is decisively lighter – 1465 kg compared to 2450 kg. The difference is around 985 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers distinct more room – 670 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 195 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Marco Polo performs convincingly better – up to 4630 L, which is about 3280 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes Marco Polo distinct takes the win – 650 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mercedes Marco Polo proves to be slightly ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes Marco Polo is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £57,500

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • Engine Type : Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.4 - 8.3 L
details

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes-Benz Marco Polo offers a luxurious and versatile travel experience, combining high-end design with practical functionality. Its spacious interior is thoughtfully designed, providing ample comfort for long journeys, while innovative features enhance the overall driving experience. This vehicle seamlessly integrates style with adventure, making it an ideal choice for those looking to explore the open road in comfort and sophistication.

details

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc seamlessly blends stylish design with practical functionality, making it an ideal choice for those who enjoy both urban and countryside driving. Its modern interior features intuitive technology and comfortable seating, enhancing the overall driving experience. With its robust build and dynamic performance, the T-Roc is equipped to handle various road conditions with confidence.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a roomier boot, so choose the Golf for sharper handling and economy or the T‑Roc if you want presence, flexibility and the delightful illusion of being an inch taller.
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
Mercedes Marco Polo
VW T-Roc
T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
57500 - 82600 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
2450 - 2545 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
5140 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1928 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1975 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
4630 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1950 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more personality for less cash.
Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; if you want style, a bit of fun and a nicer interior, the T‑Roc is the one to tempt you.
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Ford Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver assistance features, making it a top pick for families seeking comfort and safety. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a sporty driving experience with its agile handling and eye-catching design, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics.
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium interior options. Ultimately, choosing between these two best-sellers will depend on whether practicality or a dynamic driving experience takes precedence for the buyer.
Vauxhall Frontera
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Opel Frontera stands as a solid, robust option with a storied history of off-road capability, making it appealing to adventure seekers. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a more modern aesthetic with a focus on stylish urban driving, advanced safety features, and tech-savvy interior appointments. When choosing between the two, potential buyers will weigh the Frontera's rugged legacy against the T-Roc's contemporary flair and agility.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology features. Both vehicles provide ample space and versatility, making them ideal choices for urban lifestyles, but each has its unique flair to cater to different tastes.
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual preferences for versatility versus flair.
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes Marco Polo have?

The Mercedes Marco Polo is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.