Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes Vito Bus vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (237 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (36,300 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Bus or Mazda CX-60?
Mercedes Vito Bus vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vito Bus
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Vito Bus is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,341 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Bus with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers clearly more range – reaching up to 370 km, about 307 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers barely more torque with 550 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is very slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,023 kg. The difference is around 133 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Vito Bus offers substantially more boot space – 1,390 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 820 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Bus carries considerably more – 1,077 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 465 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Vito Bus holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,300
Mercedes Vito Bus
Mercedes Vito Bus
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes Vito Bus
The Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Mercedes Vito Bus
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 228 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
8
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,890 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.