VS

MG Cyberster vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (510 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (55,700 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Cyberster or Audi Q4 e-tron?

MG Cyberster vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences

MG Cyberster

  • markedly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cyberster

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,991 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the MG Cyberster. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers a bit more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 85 km more than the MG Cyberster.

Q4 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers markedly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers only slightly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 46 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Audi Q4 e-tron offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, MG Cyberster is barely lighter – 1,960 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more boot space – 535 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 335 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries considerably more – 515 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 365 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
MG Cyberster
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mercedes GLB
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Mercedes GLB both target buyers wanting a premium compact SUV, but they approach that goal very differently. The Q4 e-tron is a purpose-built electric crossover focused on efficiency, tech and a refined ride, while the GLB is a more traditional gasoline-powered (with hybrid …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Tavascan, two compact electric crossovers that blend practicality with distinctive styling. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, interior quality and value to help you choose which fits your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV put a premium compact luxury electric SUV up against a larger, family-focused electric crossover — one emphasizes refined driving dynamics and upscale interiors, the other prioritizes space, practicality and towing capability. I’ll compare range, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron are Audi’s electric SUV siblings: the compact Q4 emphasizes city-friendly size and efficiency, while the Q6 moves upmarket with more interior space, range and advanced tech. This side‑by‑side comparison will show whether the Q4’s agility and value or the Q6’s …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q4 e-tron or the …
MG Cyberster
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
200 L
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
150 kg
Payload
505 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MG
Brand
Audi
What drivetrain options does the MG Cyberster have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.