VS

MG Marvel R vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (288 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (40,300 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Marvel R or Suzuki Swift?

MG Marvel R vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

MG Marvel R

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marvel R

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Swift is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the MG Marvel R costs 40,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,135 £.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Marvel R offers substantially more power – delivering 288 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 206 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers substantially more torque with 665 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 553 Nm more.

Marvel R

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is substantially lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 741 kg.

When it comes to payload, the MG Marvel R carries markedly more – 478 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 182 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Marvel R is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,300
Marvel R

MG Marvel R

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 180 - 288 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 370 - 402 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
MG Marvel R
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Marvel R

The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.

details
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_01
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_03
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_09
Marvel-R-hero-back
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_08
Marvel-R-steering-wheel
Marvel-R-frunk

Reviews MG Marvel R

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Robin Prins
21 Feb 2026, 06:26:34

Nice-handling SUV. Steers much more sharply than my previous SUV, a Lynk & Co 01. Has almost the same options as the Lynk. I wanted fully electric, though. The Marvel has a realistic range. So far it has never shown the WLTP figure of 402. But whatever it shows, it achieves. And I've experienced that very differently before (Lynk & Co 01 and Mazda MX-30). In short, a very good, comfortable EV. Downsides: abrupt steering corrections and annoying warning beeps. These can be switched off, but you have to do it every time. It's also a shame that the otherwise great navigation has no Dutch voice.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Dacia Sandero
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Suzuki Swift are two sensible choices in the small-car segment that take different approaches: the Sandero emphasizes no‑frills value and space, while the Swift aims for sharper handling and a more polished feel. This comparison will focus on practicality, running costs, …
Hyundai i10
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
Hyundai i20
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the battle of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Suzuki Swift present compelling options for urban drivers. The Hyundai i20 stands out with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, appealing to those who prioritize comfort and connectivity. On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift is …
Kia Stonic
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Stonic and Suzuki Swift are two popular subcompact hatchbacks that aim at drivers who want nimble city cars with sensible running costs. This quick comparison looks at driving manners, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Mazda 2 Hybrid
Suzuki Swift
VS
When comparing the Mazda 2 Hybrid to the Suzuki Swift, each offers a unique appeal to city drivers and eco-conscious consumers. The Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out with its efficient fuel economy and smooth hybrid performance, offering a more contemporary design and a quieter ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
MG Marvel R
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
357 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,674 mm
Length
-
Width
1,919 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
1,613 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 478 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2021
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
MG
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the MG Marvel R have?

The MG Marvel R is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.