Compare performance (194 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to the world of compact cars, the MG MG3 and the Toyota C-HR stand out as two popular choices, each offering a unique blend of style, efficiency, and modern features. In this article, we’ll delve into a detailed comparison of these two models, examining their technical specifications and innovations that make each worth considering.
The MG MG3 is a hatchback that exudes a sporty charm. With a length of 4113 mm, a width of 1797 mm, and a height of 1502 mm, it offers a compact yet spacious design, perfect for city driving and parking. This model boasts five doors and provides seating for five, making it an ideal option for small families or urban commuters.
In contrast, the Toyota C-HR is classified as an SUV, standing slightly larger with dimensions of 4362 mm in length, 1832 mm in width, and a height ranging from 1558 mm to 1564 mm, depending on the variant. This model also features five doors, and its elevated position offers a commanding presence on the road, alongside a spacious interior. With a trunk capacity of up to 447 liters, the C-HR provides more storage space than the MG3, catering to those who require additional cargo room.
Under the hood, the MG MG3 offers two engine types: a full hybrid and a petrol variant. The petrol engine generates an impressive 116 HP, with a maximum speed of 170 km/h and a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of just 8 seconds. Its fuel consumption is rated at 6.1 L/100 km, while the hybrid version boasts an efficient consumption rate of only 4.4 L/100 km, making it a suitable choice for environmentally-conscious drivers.
The Toyota C-HR presents more versatile powertrain options, including full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants. The power output ranges from 140 HP to a dynamic 223 HP in the most powerful version, allowing for a thrilling driving experience. The C-HR’s acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies across its engine options, with the quickest version managing it in a mere 7.4 seconds. The fuel consumption for this model ranges from 4.7 L/100 km to an astonishing 0.8 L/100 km for the plug-in variant. With a maximum speed of up to 180 km/h, the C-HR combines efficiency with performance.
Both models incorporate a variety of innovative technologies designed to enhance the driving experience. The MG MG3 focuses on driver convenience with features such as a user-friendly infotainment system and responsive handling, making it a joy to drive in urban environments.
The Toyota C-HR, on the other hand, often leads in technological advancements with features like Toyota’s Safety Sense suite, which includes lane departure alert, adaptive cruise control, and pre-collision systems. The plug-in hybrid variant further boasts an electric range of up to 68 km, allowing for short commutes with zero emissions.
Environmental considerations are paramount for today’s drivers. The MG MG3 has a CO2 efficiency class rating of C, with CO2 emissions pegged at 100 g/km for the hybrid variant. With this level of efficiency, it stands as a competent option for those looking for a balance between performance and eco-friendliness.
On the flip side, the Toyota C-HR excels with a CO2 efficiency class of B, with emissions as low as 17 g/km from its plug-in version. This impressive rating reflects Toyota's commitment to sustainability and innovation in hybrid technology.
Choosing between the MG MG3 and Toyota C-HR boils down to personal preference and specific needs. The MG3 impresses with its spirited performance, compact design, and affordability, making it a strong contender for city dwellers and those on a budget.
The Toyota C-HR, with its SUV versatility, advanced safety features, and multiple powertrain choices, caters to those who prioritize innovation and a larger space. Ultimately, both cars deliver undeniable value, showcasing a blend of performance, technology, and efficiency that defines modern automotive engineering.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG MG3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers moderately more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is clearly lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 268 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG MG3 carries only slightly more – 448 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.
The Toyota C-HR stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España