VS

Omoda 5 vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or Toyota C-HR?

Omoda 5 vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more electric range
details

Toyota C-HR

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

5

Omoda 5 VS Toyota C-HR: quick synopsis for buyers

Omoda 5 VS Toyota C‑HR pits a value-packed newcomer against a more mature, efficiency‑focused crossover. The Omoda 5 leans hard on equipment, safety credentials and a long warranty to win attention, while the Toyota C‑HR answers with proven hybrid efficiency, a more composed chassis and a slightly upmarket cabin feel. Both cars share one clear compromise: rear-seat space and luggage usability are tighter than many buyers expect, so family practicality is a trade-off either way. Below we break down how those trade-offs play out in everyday life so you can decide which compromises you can live with.

C-HR

Character and driving feel

The Omoda 5 presents itself as a comfortable, softly sprung compact SUV that soaks up steady highway miles but lacks sharpness in the steering; it can feel a touch floaty and imprecise when you push it. The Toyota C‑HR, by contrast, steers with more clarity and its suspension control keeps body movements better in check, which makes it feel more confident in town and on twistier roads. Where the Omoda’s hybrid option brings obvious gains in quietness and smoothness, the Toyota’s hybrid systems reward calm driving with noticeably lower fuel use, though hard acceleration still sounds intrusive. In short, choose the Omoda if you prefer cushioned cruising and lots of driver aids, choose the C‑HR if you want composure and steering that tells you what the wheels are doing.

Comfort, cabin feel and usability

Inside, the Omoda 5 punches above its weight with dense equipment and a bold, modern look, but closer inspection reveals some cheaper plastics and fussy touchscreen menus that interrupt the user experience. The Toyota C‑HR feels more maturely resolved: materials and cabin ergonomics trend toward refinement with sensible physical controls for core functions that make daily use less fiddly. Both cars are perfectly comfortable up front, yet both leave rear passengers feeling boxed in — the Omoda’s roofline and the C‑HR’s sloping cabin each eat headroom in different ways. Day‑to‑day, the Omoda rewards tech‑minded buyers with more gadgets for less money, while the C‑HR rewards those who value a calmer, more intuitive cockpit.

Practicality and family friendliness

If you need to carry luggage or fit taller adults frequently, neither car is exemplary, but their shortcomings differ. The Omoda 5 offers a flatter, shallower boot space that makes some items awkward to stack and can be tight with bulky strollers, yet it carries weight well for a car this size which helps if you load heavy gear now and then. The Toyota C‑HR’s load area tends to be deeper but comes with a higher lip and, in plug‑in guise, less usable volume overall, so loading heavy suitcases or awkward boxes is clumsier. For child seats both can be managed, though the C‑HR’s layout makes buckling-in feel a bit neater; for regular family duty you’ll quickly notice the limits of both compared with boxier rivals.

City friendliness and running costs

In urban use the Toyota C‑HR’s hybrid systems give a clear advantage: gentler take‑offs, strong fuel economy and the option of meaningful electric‑only commuting with the PHEV variant, which reduces running costs and downtown emissions. The Omoda 5 is compelling at the point of purchase thanks to aggressive pricing and a long warranty that lowers ownership risk, but its petrol form can be thirstier in stop‑start scenarios — the hybrid version is the practical choice if you want quieter, more efficient urban driving. Parking and low‑speed maneuvering are manageable in both thanks to compact footprints and good camera systems, but the C‑HR’s steering and refinement make it easier to live with in tight traffic. Financially, the trade is simple: Toyota tends to save you fuel over time, Omoda saves you money up front and on the warranty promise.

Who should consider which car?

Choose the Omoda 5 if your priority is maximum kit, a long warranty and a strong safety package at an attractively low purchase price — it’s aimed at buyers who want immediate value and don’t expect the last word in rear‑seat space or chassis finesse. Opt for the Toyota C‑HR if you place running costs, composed handling and a slightly more refined cabin higher on your checklist, especially if you commute and can benefit from the hybrid or plug‑in set‑up. Both cars make compromises in luggage and rear passenger comfort, so your decision comes down to whether you value upfront equipment and guarantee (Omoda 5) or daily refinement and efficiency (Toyota C‑HR). The technical comparison that follows will unpack how these everyday differences map onto driving systems, cargo layouts and running costs so you can match them to your priorities.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Toyota C-HR is marginally cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Omoda 5 costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,494 £.

As for electric range, the Omoda 5 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 430 km, about 364 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers only slightly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is a bit lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,710 kg. The difference is around 205 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers noticeably more boot space – 447 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries markedly more – 536 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£31,628
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 430 km
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption

Price
31,600 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,710 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
350 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
536 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.