VS

MG MG4 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (435 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG4 or Toyota C-HR+?

MG MG4 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

MG MG4

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • barely cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MG4

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota C-HR+ is barely cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the MG MG4 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is visibly more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.1 kWh/100km for the MG MG4. That’s a difference of about 2.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers moderately more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 62 km more than the MG MG4.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG4 offers visibly more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG4 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Toyota C-HR+ takes 5.2 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG MG4 delivers substantially more torque with 600 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 262 Nm more.

MG4

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG4 is barely lighter – 1,755 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries noticeably more – 655 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 207 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG MG4 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
MG4

MG MG4

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.1 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 405 - 545 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
MG MG4
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MG4

The MG4 is a sprightly electric hatch that marries bold, modern looks with genuinely useful practicality, making it a great everyday companion for city and weekend life alike. Inside it surprises with a smart, user-friendly cabin and an engaging drive that delivers more personality than you might expect for the price.

details
MG.027.STUDIO
MG.028.STUDIO
MG.036.STUDIO
MG.038_0.STUDIO

Reviews MG MG4

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:19:27

The MG4 seems more versatile to me than the Dolphin, which relies mainly on design. The MG4 has proven itself and remains an excellent used option with low mileage.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angio
12 Jan 2026, 12:26:30

Superb

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sal
23 Oct 2025, 20:41:36

I tried it today and found the car genuinely pleasant and comfortable to drive.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
MG MG4
BYD Atto 2
VS
Think of the MG4 as the affordable hot hatch of the EV world — compact, sharp-handling and great value for drivers who want a little grin in every corner, while the BYD Atto 2 is a chilled crossover, taller, roomier and packed with clever tech and impressive real-world range. If you want lively …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
MG MG4
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG4 is a zippy compact EV that fizzes through town with sharp handling, clever packaging and an attractive price — perfect if you want fun, efficiency and a bit of character in your daily commute. By contrast the MG MGS5 EV trades some of that cheeky agility for a taller, more spacious and …
MG MG4
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
Comparing the MG4 and the BYD Dolphin Surf gives you a clear look at two affordable electric hatchbacks that target practical daily use but take very different approaches to range, interior space and driving character. If you want a compact EV that leans toward sharp handling and a sporty layout, …
MG MG4
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 40,300 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
405 - 545 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,755 - 1,810 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,836 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
448 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 435 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 600 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 320 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MG
Brand
Toyota
Is the MG MG4 offered with different drivetrains?

The MG MG4 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.