VS

MG MG4 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (30,500 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG4 or Toyota C-HR+?

MG MG4 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

MG MG4

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • moderately lighter

Toyota C-HR+

  • substantially more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MG4

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG MG4 is moderately cheaper – starting at 30,500 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,443 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is visibly more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the MG MG4. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers markedly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 157 km more than the MG MG4.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers substantially more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the MG MG4 takes 7.1 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers clearly more torque with 338 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 88 Nm more.

MG4

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG4 is moderately lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries noticeably more – 655 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 206 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
MG MG4
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MG4

The MG4 is a sprightly electric hatch that marries bold, modern looks with genuinely useful practicality, making it a great everyday companion for city and weekend life alike. Inside it surprises with a smart, user-friendly cabin and an engaging drive that delivers more personality than you might expect for the price.

details
MG.027.STUDIO
MG.028.STUDIO
MG.036.STUDIO
MG.038_0.STUDIO

Reviews MG MG4

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Angio
12 Jan 2026, 12:26:30

Superb

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sal
23 Oct 2025, 20:41:36

I tried it today and found the car genuinely pleasant and comfortable to drive.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG4
BYD Atto 2
VS
Think of the MG4 as the affordable hot hatch of the EV world — compact, sharp-handling and great value for drivers who want a little grin in every corner, while the BYD Atto 2 is a chilled crossover, taller, roomier and packed with clever tech and impressive real-world range. If you want lively …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Kia EV4 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The electric Kia EV4 Hatchback — slick, tech-packed and built for range-minded commutes — goes head-to-head with the quirky, style-first Toyota C‑HR+, a compact crossover that favours personality and frugal running costs. By the end of this DriveDuel showdown we’ll tell you which one deserves your …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR+
VS
When the Lexus LBX squares off against the Toyota C-HR+, you're looking at badge-driven luxury versus clever value in the same compact package. We'll sort out which car looks better in the driveway, feels sharper behind the wheel, and — crucially — makes more sense for your money (spoiler: it's not …
MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
MG MG4
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,500 - 36,500 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
330 - 450 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,695 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,836 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
389 - 449 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 204 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 - 150 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MG
Brand
Toyota
Is the MG MG4 offered with different drivetrains?

The MG MG4 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.