Compare performance (197 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (18000 £ vs 24400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Renault Symbioz?
The automotive industry continues to evolve, with manufacturers increasingly focusing on functionality, sustainability, and style. In the increasingly competitive SUV segment, we have an intriguing comparison between two distinct models: the MG ZS and the Renault Symbioz. Both vehicles offer innovative technology and impressive specifications, but how do they really stack up against each other? Let's delve into the details.
The MG ZS comes in various configurations, presenting options for electric, full hybrid, and petrol engines. Depending on the configuration, the ZS boasts a power output between 116 and 197 horsepower, accompanied by a flexible torque range peaking at 280 Nm. The vehicle accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 8.6 to 8.7 seconds, depending on the model year selected.
With front-wheel drive as standard and an automatic or manual transmission option, the ZS provides a balance between functionality and performance. It features a generous electric range of up to 440 kilometers, refined through its battery capacity of up to 65.7 kWh. Efficiency is key here, with an impressive combined consumption of just 5 liters per 100 km in its petrol variant or 17.3 kWh/100 km for electric variants, meeting diverse consumer needs.
The vehicle dimensions are quite accommodating as well—measuring 4323 mm in length, 1809 mm in width, and 1649 mm in height—giving ample headroom and cargo space with a trunk capacity of 448 liters.
On the other side of the comparison, we have the Renault Symbioz, a model characterized by its full hybrid configuration. It delivers 143 horsepower with a torque of 250 Nm, achieving a 0-100 km/h acceleration in 10.6 seconds. Although this might seem slower compared to the MG ZS, the Symbioz focuses heavily on eco-friendliness and fuel efficiency, offering a consumption rate of only 4.8 liters per 100 km and low CO2 emissions of 109 g/km.
Notably, the Symbioz features an automatic transmission and front-wheel drive. While it carries a smaller engine capacity of 1598 cm3, its battery capacity of 0.6 kWh emphasizes its hybrid nature rather than a fully electric drive, which may appeal to drivers who prefer more traditional performance coupled with modern efficiency. In terms of dimensions, the Symbioz is slightly larger at 4413 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height, offering a more spacious trunk capacity of 492 liters.
Innovation drives both the MG ZS and Renault Symbioz forward. The ZS is equipped with a range of tech features, including advanced driver-assistance systems, smart connectivity options, and a contemporary infotainment system integrated into its ergonomic interior layout.
Meanwhile, the Symbioz is not just a car; it’s designed to be a forward-thinking space that embodies Renault's vision for mobility. With a futuristic design and attention to sustainable materials, the Symbioz signals a shift towards eco-friendly driving experiences. The advanced infotainment and connectivity within this model aim to provide a seamless integration of technology into daily life.
When comparing the MG ZS and the Renault Symbioz, it ultimately comes down to what the consumer values in an SUV. If you're looking for a vehicle that excels in performance and offers a broader engine choice, the MG ZS may be the better fit for you. However, if your focus is on sustainability and futuristic design, the Renault Symbioz positions itself as a commendable option. With both vehicles showcasing their unique attributes, the market continues to expand in the direction of innovation and adaptability.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG ZS has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6437 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Symbioz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a slightly edge – offering 197 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.10 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Symbioz pulls significantly stronger with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG ZS is hardly perceptible lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1359 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.
When it comes to payload, MG ZS slight takes the win – 470 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Renault Symbioz sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18000 - 24000 £
|
Price
24400 - 30700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
|
Curb weight
1359 - 1465 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4413 mm
|
|
Width
1818 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1682 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Renault
|
The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España