What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the MG ZS deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the MG ZS delivers up to 197 HP.

How much fuel does the MG ZS use?

On average, the MG ZS consumes 5 L.

What is the top speed of the MG ZS?

Depending on the model, top speed is 179 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the MG ZS?

The MG ZS measures 4430 mm long, 1818 mm wide and 1635 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kamiq?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Kamiq deliver on the road?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kamiq according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.30 L.

What maximum speed does the Skoda Kamiq reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 216 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq?

Length 4241 mm, width 1793 mm, height 1562 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq.

MG ZS vs Skoda Kamiq - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3720 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG ZS manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a distinct edge – offering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 37 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls clearly stronger with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm difference.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is minimal lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1330 kg. The difference is around 99 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG ZS offers minimal more room – 443 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs barely noticeable better – up to 1457 L, which is about 62 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq a bit takes the win – 539 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (3 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Skoda Kamiq

VW T-Roc

VS

Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …

SEAT Arona

Skoda Kamiq

VS

Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice …

Costs and Consumption
Price 18000 - 24000 £	Price 21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 5 - 6.5 L	Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 113 - 145 g/km	co2 121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 41 - 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1330 - 1420 kg	Curb weight 1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity 443 L	Trunk capacity 400 L
Length 4430 mm	Length 4241 mm
Width 1818 mm	Width 1793 mm
Height 1635 mm	Height 1562 mm
Max trunk capacity 1457 L	Max trunk capacity 1395 L
Payload 375 - 470 kg	Payload 439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 116 - 197 HP	Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 12.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed 168 - 179 km/h	Max Speed 183 - 216 km/h
Torque 148 Nm	Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 85 - 145 kW	Power kW 70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1495 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3