@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

MG ZS vs Skoda Kamiq – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether MG ZS or Skoda Kamiq fits your lifestyle better.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG ZS vs. Skoda Kamiq: Compact SUVs Battle It Out

In the realm of compact SUVs, the MG ZS and Skoda Kamiq have become favorite contenders for those seeking versatility, innovation, and efficiency. Both vehicles blend modern technology with practical design, yet they cater to slightly different driver needs. Here, we dive into the details to help you decide which SUV suits your style and requirements.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Performance and Engine Options

The MG ZS stands out with its diverse range of engines. Available in fully electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants, the ZS caters to a broad spectrum of automotive preferences. It boasts power figures ranging from 116 HP in its petrol variant up to 197 HP in its hybrid edition. For those seeking an electric experience, the MG ZS can travel up to 440 km on a single charge of its 65.7 kWh battery, adding to its appeal in an eco-conscious market.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq sticks with the tried-and-tested petrol engines. Power outputs for the Kamiq range from 95 HP to 150 HP, offering a robust performance with a top speed of up to 214 km/h. This petrol-only approach offers simplicity and reliability, with three-cylinder and four-cylinder options, ensuring smooth operation and impressive speeds.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency

The MG ZS shines in fuel efficiency, particularly with its electric variant that boasts an impressive range coupled with a consumption rate of just 17.3-17.8 kWh/100km. Its hybrid and petrol versions also provide economical performance, with consumption figures as low as 5 – 6.5 L/100km, complementing its environmentally friendly emission ratings.

On the Skoda side, the Kamiq provides respectable efficiency for a petrol engine, consuming between 5.4 and 5.7 L/100km. Although it cannot match the zero emissions of the electric ZS model, this consumption rate makes it a competitive choice for traditional engine enthusiasts.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior Comfort and Practicality

Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably, making them perfect for family rides or group adventures. The MG ZS provides a generous trunk capacity of up to 448 liters, offering significant room for luggage, whereas the Skoda Kamiq offers a slightly smaller boot space at 400 liters but remains practical for daily use.

Dimensionally, the MG ZS is marginally larger, with a length of up to 4430 mm and a width of 1818 mm, creating a spacious feel within. However, the Skoda Kamiq, with a slightly shorter length of 4241 mm and a width of 1793 mm, offers a more nimble profile, especially suitable for urban environments.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Modern Innovations

In terms of technological innovation, the MG ZS breaks new ground with its electric powertrain, providing an exciting glimpse into the future of driving. Its array of powertrains ensures it appeals to a wide audience, from traditionalists to eco-minded adventurers. Additionally, its capacity for rapid acceleration (reaching 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 8.6 seconds) enhances its allure.

The Skoda Kamiq emphasizes driver assistance and connectivity. Equipped with modern infotainment systems, seamless smartphone integration, and advanced safety features, the Kamiq delivers a comprehensive driving experience marked by convenience and reliability.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

The Verdict

The choice between the MG ZS and Skoda Kamiq ultimately comes down to individual priorities. If a cutting-edge electric experience or a more varied powertrain selection is your aim, the MG ZS has the upper hand. However, if a straightforward, efficient petrol engine wrapped in a compact, urban-friendly package is more appealing, the Skoda Kamiq certainly stands its ground.

Whichever model you lean towards, both the MG ZS and the Skoda Kamiq exemplify robust design and modern efficiency, making them worthy competitors in the bustling compact SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £, while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21700 £. That’s a price difference of around 3720 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG ZS manages with 5 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a distinct edge – offering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 37 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls clearly stronger with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm difference.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is minimal lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1330 kg. The difference is around 99 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG ZS offers minimal more room – 443 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs barely noticeable better – up to 1457 L, which is about 62 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq a bit takes the win – 539 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG ZS proves to be only a minor advantage and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG ZS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £18,000
ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG ZS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 6.5 L

MG ZS

5 (1)
rate

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)
rate

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details
MG ZS
Skoda Kamiq
ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption

Price
18000 - 24000 £
Price
21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 145 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
4430 mm
Length
4241 mm
Width
1818 mm
Width
1793 mm
Height
1635 mm
Height
1562 mm
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
MG
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.