Compare performance (197 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 21,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Skoda Kamiq?
In the realm of compact SUVs, the MG ZS and Skoda Kamiq have become favorite contenders for those seeking versatility, innovation, and efficiency. Both vehicles blend modern technology with practical design, yet they cater to slightly different driver needs. Here, we dive into the details to help you decide which SUV suits your style and requirements.
The MG ZS stands out with its diverse range of engines. Available in fully electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants, the ZS caters to a broad spectrum of automotive preferences. It boasts power figures ranging from 116 HP in its petrol variant up to 197 HP in its hybrid edition. For those seeking an electric experience, the MG ZS can travel up to 440 km on a single charge of its 65.7 kWh battery, adding to its appeal in an eco-conscious market.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq sticks with the tried-and-tested petrol engines. Power outputs for the Kamiq range from 95 HP to 150 HP, offering a robust performance with a top speed of up to 214 km/h. This petrol-only approach offers simplicity and reliability, with three-cylinder and four-cylinder options, ensuring smooth operation and impressive speeds.
The MG ZS shines in fuel efficiency, particularly with its electric variant that boasts an impressive range coupled with a consumption rate of just 17.3-17.8 kWh/100km. Its hybrid and petrol versions also provide economical performance, with consumption figures as low as 5 – 6.5 L/100km, complementing its environmentally friendly emission ratings.
On the Skoda side, the Kamiq provides respectable efficiency for a petrol engine, consuming between 5.4 and 5.7 L/100km. Although it cannot match the zero emissions of the electric ZS model, this consumption rate makes it a competitive choice for traditional engine enthusiasts.
Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably, making them perfect for family rides or group adventures. The MG ZS provides a generous trunk capacity of up to 448 liters, offering significant room for luggage, whereas the Skoda Kamiq offers a slightly smaller boot space at 400 liters but remains practical for daily use.
Dimensionally, the MG ZS is marginally larger, with a length of up to 4430 mm and a width of 1818 mm, creating a spacious feel within. However, the Skoda Kamiq, with a slightly shorter length of 4241 mm and a width of 1793 mm, offers a more nimble profile, especially suitable for urban environments.
In terms of technological innovation, the MG ZS breaks new ground with its electric powertrain, providing an exciting glimpse into the future of driving. Its array of powertrains ensures it appeals to a wide audience, from traditionalists to eco-minded adventurers. Additionally, its capacity for rapid acceleration (reaching 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 8.6 seconds) enhances its allure.
The Skoda Kamiq emphasizes driver assistance and connectivity. Equipped with modern infotainment systems, seamless smartphone integration, and advanced safety features, the Kamiq delivers a comprehensive driving experience marked by convenience and reliability.
The choice between the MG ZS and Skoda Kamiq ultimately comes down to individual priorities. If a cutting-edge electric experience or a more varied powertrain selection is your aim, the MG ZS has the upper hand. However, if a straightforward, efficient petrol engine wrapped in a compact, urban-friendly package is more appealing, the Skoda Kamiq certainly stands its ground.
Whichever model you lean towards, both the MG ZS and the Skoda Kamiq exemplify robust design and modern efficiency, making them worthy competitors in the bustling compact SUV market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG ZS is noticeably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 21,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,720 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers substantially more torque with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is only slightly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 99 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries somewhat more – 539 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
The MG ZS is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
21,700 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,241 mm
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España