@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

MG ZS vs Skoda Karoq - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (197 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (18000 £ vs 29100 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Skoda Karoq?

MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate

Skoda Karoq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG ZS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £, while the Skoda Karoq costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 11091 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Karoq manages with 4.90 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a slight edge – offering 197 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs slightly better – reaching 221 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 42 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls convincingly stronger with 360 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 212 Nm difference.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, MG ZS is hardly perceptible lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers to a small extent more room – 521 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs to a small extent better – up to 1630 L, which is about 173 L more than the MG ZS.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq to a small extent takes the win – 549 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Karoq proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Karoq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £29,100
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L
details
MG ZS
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Skoda Karoq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Reviews MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Skoda Karoq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
MG ZS
Skoda Karoq
ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption
Price
18000 - 24000 £
Price
29100 - 41700 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 145 g/km
co2
128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
521 L
Length
4430 mm
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Width
1818 mm
Width
1841 mm
Height
1635 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
MG
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG3
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the MG ZS and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their unique offerings and charm. The MG ZS delivers remarkable value with its robust features and spacious interior, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, while the Nissan Qashqai impresses with its refined driving …
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG ZS is the no-nonsense, value-packed compact SUV that gives you straightforward practicality and low running costs, while the MG MGS5 EV dials in electric refinement, sharper styling and longer range for drivers ready to swap petrol for a charging cable. If you want bang-for-buck, easy …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. …
@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C4
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG ZS
VS
The Citroen C4 and the MG ZS both offer distinct appeals for compact SUV enthusiasts, each targeting a unique clientele with their design and features. The Citroen C4 stands out with its avant-garde styling and innovative interior technology, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq offers practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families and those seeking comfort. While the …
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.