VS

MG ZS vs Skoda Karoq comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Skoda Karoq?

MG ZS vs Skoda Karoq: Key differences

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • barely more power
  • marginally lighter

Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,091 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Karoq uses 4.9 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Karoq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers barely more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers substantially more torque with 360 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 212 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,380 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries moderately more – 549 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Karoq holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
Karoq

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
MG ZS
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Skoda Karoq

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494

Reviews Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …
Skoda Karoq
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
We line up the Skoda Karoq against the Toyota Corolla Cross to settle which compact SUV deserves your keys. The Karoq brings clever Czech packaging and Euro finesse, while the Corolla Cross answers with Toyota’s rock‑solid reliability and wallet‑friendly running costs—so read on if you prefer …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its sleek design and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban adventures, while the Skoda Karoq offers remarkable practicality and interior space, appealing to families and long-distance travelers. Both crossovers come equipped with a suite of advanced …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
MG ZS
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
521 L
Length
-
Length
4,390 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Height
-
Height
1,624 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,630 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
192 - 210 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
MG
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.