VS

MG ZS vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Suzuki S-Cross?

MG ZS vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ZS

MG ZS vs Suzuki S-Cross: An In-Depth Comparison

The automotive market is witnessing a growing interest in compact SUVs, with the MG ZS and Suzuki S-Cross emerging as strong contenders. Though both vehicles boast an array of features catering to modern drivers, they also harbor distinct characteristics that may sway potential buyers. In this article, we will explore the technical aspects and innovations of these two SUVs to help you make an informed choice.

S-Cross

Performance and Engine Options

Starting with the MG ZS, this vehicle offers impressive power outputs, with variations between 156 to 197 HP from its electric and hybrid variants. The ZS features a front-wheel-drive layout and an automatic transmission that provides a seamless driving experience. With acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h achieved in just 8.6 seconds, it stands out in its segment.

On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross is equipped with either a full hybrid or petrol MHEV system, yielding 116 to 129 HP. While it may not match the ZS’s performance, the S-Cross offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, enhancing traction and control on various terrains. Acceleration is noticeably slower, clocking in at approximately 9.5 seconds for a similar leap.

ZS

Fuel Consumption and Efficiency

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both vehicles have their strengths. The MG ZS manages a commendable energy consumption of about 5 to 5.1 L/100km, while the electric variants can achieve ranges up to 440 km on a single charge, thanks to its battery capacities of 49.3 to 65.7 kWh. This makes the ZS an enticing choice for those leaning towards hybrid or electric power.

Conversely, the Suzuki S-Cross's consumption ranges from 5.1 to 5.8 L/100km, slightly higher than that of its MG rival. While it offers a respectable performance level, it falls short in the electric range category, making the ZS the clear leader in efficiency for eco-conscious consumers.

S-Cross

Design and Dimensions

From a design perspective, both SUVs present well-developed aesthetics. The MG ZS has dimensions of 4323 mm in length, 1809 mm in width, and 1649 mm in height. Inside, it offers ample trunk space of 448 L, making it suitable for family outings or long road trips.

The Suzuki S-Cross is marginally longer at 4300 mm and features a width of 1785 mm and a height of 1580 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly smaller at 430 L. While the difference in size may appear minimal, it's significant for buyers prioritizing cargo space.

ZS

Innovative Features

Innovation plays a crucial role in the ongoing rivalry between MG and Suzuki. The MG ZS comes equipped with modern features such as advanced safety systems, a user-friendly infotainment system, and smartphone connectivity; all of which enhance the driving experience.

The S-Cross does not disappoint either, featuring an intuitive interface and a comprehensive suite of safety technologies. Moreover, its available all-wheel-drive system serves as a significant innovation, providing better handling and control under various driving conditions.

S-Cross

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In conclusion, the ultimate decision between the MG ZS and Suzuki S-Cross hinges on personal preferences and priorities. If you seek cutting-edge technology, eco-friendly performance, and greater cargo capacity, the MG ZS solidifies its position as a clear favorite. However, if versatile driving conditions, a traditional petrol engine, and a solid build are your key considerations, the Suzuki S-Cross deserves your attention.

Each of these compact SUVs has unique offerings, ensuring that there's a suitable option for every potential buyer in this competitive segment.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers clearly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki S-Cross delivers noticeably more torque with 235 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 87 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is very slightly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG ZS offers barely more boot space – 443 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries slightly more – 470 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details
MG ZS
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
MG ZS
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
MG
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.