VS

MINI Aceman vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Suzuki S-Cross?

MINI Aceman vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki S-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,238 £.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers clearly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 148 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers visibly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 115 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is visibly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 440 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers markedly more boot space – 430 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 130 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries noticeably more – 530 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
MINI Aceman
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Kona and S‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city‑friendly dimensions with SUV practicality. This comparison highlights the key differences in styling, interior space, powertrains, fuel economy and running costs to help you choose which suits your needs.
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
MINI Aceman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Aceman and the Volkswagen ID.3 offer two distinct takes on the compact electric car: the Aceman leans on MINI’s character and driver-focused feel, while the ID.3 emphasizes efficiency, roomy interior and everyday practicality. This comparison will cut through the specs to show where they …
Ford Kuga
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Ford Kuga and the Suzuki S‑Cross helps you decide between a bigger, more tech-rich family SUV and a compact, practical crossover that’s easier on the wallet. Below is a direct, practical breakdown to help match each car to real-life needs. Quick verdict - Ford Kuga: A more spacious, …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Opel Frontera and Suzuki S-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Opel Frontera or the …
MINI Aceman
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
MINI
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.