VS

MINI Aceman vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Volvo ES90?

MINI Aceman vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MINI Aceman is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 42,934 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo ES90. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 351 km more than the MINI Aceman.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 422 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers substantially more torque with 870 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 520 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is considerably lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 890 kg.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries moderately more – 530 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 km
MINI Aceman
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
MINI Aceman
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MINI
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.