VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Arkana – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Arkana?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi ASX has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £. That’s a price difference of around 7895 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a minimal edge – offering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mitsubishi ASX performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls distinct stronger with 270 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is slightly lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers barely noticeable more room – 484 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1596 L, which is about 333 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Renault Arkana slight takes the win – 451 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 2 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,600
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX presents itself as a compact crossover that combines practicality with style. Its sleek design and versatile interior make it an appealing choice for both urban and rural settings. With a focus on providing a comfortable driving experience, the ASX also offers a range of modern features that enhance connectivity and safety.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low @ Mitsubishi
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low @ Mitsubishi
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low @ Mitsubishi
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low @ Mitsubishi

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p @ Renault
r210654p @ Renault
r210665p @ Renault
r210657p @ Renault
r210613p @ Renault
r210616p @ Renault

Similar Comparisons

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the latest showdown between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz, two distinct design philosophies come to the forefront. The Arkana impresses with its sporty coupe-SUV silhouette and practical versatility, making it perfect for urban drivers who crave style and functionality. Meanwhile, the Symbioz, as a bold vision of the future, showcases advanced autonomous technologies and an eco-friendly design, making it a fascinating glimpse into how Renault is shaping the sustainable automotive landscape.
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious interior, making it ideal for families. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to personal style and practicality, providing consumers with impressive options from Renault's growing lineup.
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Arkana
ASX
Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
20600 - 32500 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
99 - 135 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4239 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
397 - 449 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and adventure-seekers. Both models showcase Renault's commitment to innovation and efficiency, making them strong contenders in their segment.
Mitsubishi ASX
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Renault Arkana
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Arkana brings a sleek coupe-inspired design coupled with a robust performance, contrasting with the upcoming Dacia Bigster, which promises a rugged and spacious ride. The Arkana offers a more premium feel with its refined handling and advanced technology suite, whereas the Bigster is expected to attract adventure-seekers looking for practicality and an affordable price tag. As both models vie for attention, potential buyers will have to weigh Renault's stylish sophistication against Dacia's utilitarian charm.
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their distinctive styling and practicality. While the ASX offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, the Vitara impresses with its off-road capabilities and zippy handling. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to whether you prioritize everyday comfort or adventurous versatility.
Mitsubishi ASX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX stands out with its robust design and practicality, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. In contrast, the Toyota Yaris Cross combines sporty aesthetics with impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers without compromising on style. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, offering unique strengths that cater to diverse customer needs.
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without sacrificing practicality. Both models come with efficient engines and modern tech, but the choice ultimately depends on whether you prioritize functionality or flair.
Renault Arkana
SEAT Ateca
VS
Citroen C4
Renault Arkana
VS
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.