VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Arkana?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

Renault Arkana

3.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,037 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.4 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX offers marginally more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers moderately more torque with 245 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is slightly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries marginally more – 451 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details

Renault Arkana

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.