@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Clio - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (158 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (20600 £ vs 16600 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Clio?

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Renault Clio

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £, while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 20600 £. That’s a price difference of around 3977 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.40 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

Clio @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the has a edge – offering compared to . That’s roughly more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the performs better – reaching , while the tops out at . The difference is around .

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 270 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Renault Clio is to a small extent lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1296 kg. The difference is around 172 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers a bit more room – 484 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 93 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs evident better – up to 1596 L, which is about 420 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, Renault Clio hardly perceptible takes the win – 463 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,600
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Clio
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Clio @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
20600 - 32500 £
Price
16600 - 23700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
99 - 135 g/km
co2
92 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
4239 mm
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
Payload
397 - 449 kg
Payload
398 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2023 - 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.