Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi ASX vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (158 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (20600 £ vs 69800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Volvo XC90?
ASX
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi ASX has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 49200 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC90 manages with 3.50 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a clearly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 297 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.50 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls decisively stronger with 709 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 439 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
ASX
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is clearly lighter – 1296 kg compared to 2080 kg. The difference is around 784 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers clearly perceptible more room – 484 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 182 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC90 performs to a small extent better – up to 1856 L, which is about 260 L more than the Mitsubishi ASX.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC90 distinct takes the win – 710 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 261 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Volvo XC90 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £69,800
Volvo XC90
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi ASX
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Volvo XC90
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20600 - 32500 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
99 - 135 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
4239 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1797 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1575 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
397 - 449 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.