VS

Mitsubishi Colt vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Renault Arkana?

Mitsubishi Colt vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Mitsubishi Colt

  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Colt

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Colt is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,295 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

Both models deliver identical power – 143 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Colt is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 9.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Arkana delivers noticeably more torque with 205 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is clearly lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 321 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries slightly more – 451 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Colt is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,200
Colt

Mitsubishi Colt

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 91 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
The Qashqai and Arkana are two compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on everyday practicality and comfort, while the Arkana trades a bit of rear space for a sportier, coupe-like profile and distinctive style. I’ll compare them on the things that matter—space and …
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
All-New COLT_003

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana
VS
In the burgeoning world of crossover SUVs, the Peugeot 408 and Renault Arkana both offer distinctive styles and robust performance. The Peugeot 408 captivates with its sharp design and intuitive technology features, providing a smooth yet dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Arkana
VS
Hyundai Kona and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Hyundai Kona or the …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Hyundai Tucson
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson and Renault Arkana both stand out but for different reasons. The Hyundai Tucson offers a spacious interior with a tech-savvy approach, providing a comfortable ride with its robust safety features and advanced entertainment system. On the …
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Kia Niro and Renault Arkana both offer distinct advantages. The Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid and electric options, catering to environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana captivates with …
Kia Sportage
Renault Arkana
VS
Kia Sportage and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Sportage or the …
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
96 - 119 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,053 mm
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
1,439 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
381 - 385 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
174 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Colt have?

The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.