VS

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Skoda Kodiaq?

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more electric range
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Eclipse Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq is only slightly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,257 £.

As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers clearly more range – reaching up to 627 km, about 505 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers moderately more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Eclipse Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is moderately lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,922 kg. The difference is around 238 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more boot space – 910 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 365 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries visibly more – 563 kg compared to 413 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,100
Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 615 - 627 km
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
615 - 627 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,922 - 1,950 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
545 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,908 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 - 413 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
160 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.